Mixed Ratings

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
Doug
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:27 pm

Post by Doug »

Wes wrote:Trad crack climbing isn't harder then sport at all. Just different. Anyone who says otherwise is just trying to pad their ego.

Wes
I would have to respectfuly disagree. Perhaps the moves would be of the same technical difficulty ( given similar types of climb ), but with trad you have a different set of skills you have to master. Finding and placing pro and arranging safe belays are add another level of complexity.
Also you tend to have a lot more on your mind in trad. Is that nut shitty? Is that cam starting to walk? Hey God, if you get me out of this shit I'll be a good boy ( or girl ) forever!
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Post by Toad »

Doug wrote: Also you tend to have a lot more on your mind in trad. Is that nut shitty?...
If you are asking yourself about a shitty nut, then you need to wipe more and not so much in the back to front configuration.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

I think once you have a crack route wired it feels the same as a sport route you have wired. For example, Days of Rage required just as much effort as Snooker *during the redpoint*. Only during the redpoint. *Working* a hard crack is usually more difficult because you don't have an obvious sequence to follow. Sure, you follow the crack, but anyone who has done hard crack lines knows that there are extremely subtle movements involved it's usually pretty tough to figure out just where to put your fingers and which fingers to use. Whereas on a tough sport line you usually have beta from 100 people and a nice set of holds to follow.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

trad is only harder because the old farts climbing on gear have sandbagged the ratings system for so long it is no longer reliable. my mentors always told me that route finding and gear placement had no bearing on the rating..is that wrong?
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

You're right for sure.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

let me calrify that....getting a s, vs, r, or x would be partially because of the gear placements, but the actual yosemite number rating was supposed to be based purely on the difficulty of the climbing.
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
Caspian
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 9:28 pm

Post by Caspian »

I think the British Grading System is a interesting alternative.
"how ironic....now he's blind after a life of enjoying being able to see."~Homer
Caspian
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 9:28 pm

Post by Caspian »

The British Rating has two different grades: an adjectival grading and a technical grading. The adjectival grading says something about the overall difficulty of the climb. The technical grading says something about the most difficult move of the climb. So, an easy climb with a difficult move would have a relatively low adjectival grading with a high technical rating (like E4/6c). A sustained climb with long runouts and poor pro but no real difficult technical moves then has a high adjectival rating with a low technical rating (like E7/6b).
"how ironic....now he's blind after a life of enjoying being able to see."~Homer
Caspian
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 9:28 pm

Post by Caspian »

So is *poser* a benchmark rank at 200 posts or did you guys just figure me out?
"how ironic....now he's blind after a life of enjoying being able to see."~Homer
marathonmedic
Posts: 1557
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:01 am

Post by marathonmedic »

You should feel honored. Eric has the same one.
Ticking is gym climbing outdoors.
Post Reply