I am wondering after you climb something how do you repel down with out leaving behind at least a biner.
Say you climb to the top of this
http://www.redriverclimbing.com/album_p ... pic_id=389
when you repel down do you just leave the equipment up there and "take one for the team" or do you "leave no trace"?
It seems to me that if you repel down a multi pitch problem then that could get expensive.
Just curious.
Leaving behind equipment
In the old days you threw your rope around a likely tree. When you rapped down, you pulled your rope and left nothing. Problem with that is that a buttload of raps would wear through the bark on the tree and possibly kill it. Nowadays standard raps often have anchors placed for the rap.
You can run your rope through a sling and rap off of it without the aid of a biner. Leaving slings at rap stations has been a standard process for a long time. Donating one sling per rap shouldn't turn into a major expense. Climbers leave plenty of traces. Look at all the chalk on the walls. Do what you can to minimize your impact without seriously compromising your safety. Nature-colored slings as opposed to bright red help.
ZSpider
You can run your rope through a sling and rap off of it without the aid of a biner. Leaving slings at rap stations has been a standard process for a long time. Donating one sling per rap shouldn't turn into a major expense. Climbers leave plenty of traces. Look at all the chalk on the walls. Do what you can to minimize your impact without seriously compromising your safety. Nature-colored slings as opposed to bright red help.
ZSpider
you referred to a photo of Castleton and the Rectory, both of which have fixed rappels/bolted at 100-200' intervals. There is no need to leave anything at all. Just thread your rope and down you go to the next ledge w/ a bolted rap station.
The descent down the North Face of Castleton is almost as exciting as an ascent of the same route(castleton north face): very, very steep/ very, very tall.
The descent down the North Face of Castleton is almost as exciting as an ascent of the same route(castleton north face): very, very steep/ very, very tall.
honor401 wrote:
So what do you think about the chalk alternatives? Do those work as well as chalk?
***********
There was brown chalk available for a while. Supposedly it would blend better with the rock. It had a distinctly greasy feel to it, and didn't last long. Although I'm sure you can find it somewhere, I don't see it anywhere.
But to answer your question, I don't know of any adequate chalk alternative other than simply doing without it. As SCGC implied, its impact is more of an aesthetic issue than environmental. Chalk hell out of everything. I do.
ZSpider
So what do you think about the chalk alternatives? Do those work as well as chalk?
***********
There was brown chalk available for a while. Supposedly it would blend better with the rock. It had a distinctly greasy feel to it, and didn't last long. Although I'm sure you can find it somewhere, I don't see it anywhere.
But to answer your question, I don't know of any adequate chalk alternative other than simply doing without it. As SCGC implied, its impact is more of an aesthetic issue than environmental. Chalk hell out of everything. I do.
ZSpider