What kills me is how the RRGCC thinks that the users of this site don't make up the average population of climbers at the Red River Gorge.
I have on average 1.5 million hits a month. We have 1,100 registered users. Even if 100 of them are trolls, that's 1,000 users.
I'd say that's a pretty good turnout. 8)
New Parking Areas in the Preserve?
Monthly Statistics for June 2004
Total Hits 1348362
Total Files 571268
Total Pages 32091
Total Visits 12194
Total KBytes 5878450
Total Unique Sites 6130
Total Unique URLs 734
Total Unique Referrers 526
Total Unique User Agents 705
Avg Max
Hits per Hour 1872 9217
Hits per Day 44945 85307
Files per Day 19042 31944
Pages per Day 1069 1790
Visits per Day 406 574
KBytes per Day 195948 312706
Total Hits 1348362
Total Files 571268
Total Pages 32091
Total Visits 12194
Total KBytes 5878450
Total Unique Sites 6130
Total Unique URLs 734
Total Unique Referrers 526
Total Unique User Agents 705
Avg Max
Hits per Hour 1872 9217
Hits per Day 44945 85307
Files per Day 19042 31944
Pages per Day 1069 1790
Visits per Day 406 574
KBytes per Day 195948 312706
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!
-Horatio
-Horatio
Ray, you should start charging the rrgcc a click through fee...
Man, it is crazy how much *they* are unwilling to let this site actually help. Take the online guide, Ray and Jack wrote a kick ass guide that works. So, instead of supporting or just letting this one be, the RRGCC has to do their own online guide. If all the time and effort that went into creating another, un-needed, on-line guide for the red, was put into just basic updates of the rrgcc.org site, that site would kick much more ass then it does now. Seems kindy petty to me. Almost like envy or something.
Hint: If more time was spent keeping the rrgcc site updated with fresh content, even if it is just "Yep, nothing new this week, but we had fun looking at a new area", then much of the rumors and stuff would go away.
Wes
Man, it is crazy how much *they* are unwilling to let this site actually help. Take the online guide, Ray and Jack wrote a kick ass guide that works. So, instead of supporting or just letting this one be, the RRGCC has to do their own online guide. If all the time and effort that went into creating another, un-needed, on-line guide for the red, was put into just basic updates of the rrgcc.org site, that site would kick much more ass then it does now. Seems kindy petty to me. Almost like envy or something.
Hint: If more time was spent keeping the rrgcc site updated with fresh content, even if it is just "Yep, nothing new this week, but we had fun looking at a new area", then much of the rumors and stuff would go away.
Wes
"There is no secret ingredient"
Po, the kung fu panda
Po, the kung fu panda
I agree. It appears from all of the complaining that they consider this site nothing more than an irritation and a poor venue for information exchange. So, let them pay to be irritated. We'll still discuss things here.
Jesus only knows that she tries too hard. She's only trying to keep the sky from falling.
-Everlast
-Everlast
what a cool bunch of 13 year olds this site is! i wonder if there are trends that could be tracked between how much people are climbing, the weather, and the amount of hostility they spew on this bbs.
my only thought is that artsay originally wanted facts... then all of a sudden decided she was looking for opinions from users of this board. change your tune, it makes it easier to get worked into a frenzy of anger.
it's so fun to be hostile toward the rrgcc, of which most of you are a part... calling us "them" or "they" as if you are not a part of the organization. I know we have problems with communication, but as johnny (also 13 years old) was sarcastically saying in his other thread is that you can't expect an answer to a question within minutes or maybe even days. just because you spend all your time here doesn't mean that the rrgcc officials who are "in the know" necessarily do. I for one, am glad. it's even quite possible that those "in the know" have to work hard to be in the know and are working hard to do so in order to answer a question of fact... not one of opinion.
so enjoy ripping on the rrgcc... boy is it fun to have someone to stone. anger is the easiest step, and the most enjoyable flavor... but in the end it is you that it is hurting.
my only thought is that artsay originally wanted facts... then all of a sudden decided she was looking for opinions from users of this board. change your tune, it makes it easier to get worked into a frenzy of anger.
it's so fun to be hostile toward the rrgcc, of which most of you are a part... calling us "them" or "they" as if you are not a part of the organization. I know we have problems with communication, but as johnny (also 13 years old) was sarcastically saying in his other thread is that you can't expect an answer to a question within minutes or maybe even days. just because you spend all your time here doesn't mean that the rrgcc officials who are "in the know" necessarily do. I for one, am glad. it's even quite possible that those "in the know" have to work hard to be in the know and are working hard to do so in order to answer a question of fact... not one of opinion.
so enjoy ripping on the rrgcc... boy is it fun to have someone to stone. anger is the easiest step, and the most enjoyable flavor... but in the end it is you that it is hurting.
[size=75]i may be weak, but i have bad technique[/size]
It's called a discussion. And I'm glad the topic was discussed because I received some very good insight into this rumor (thanks rhino) as well as several other rumors that sounded too ridiculous to be true. In fact, for all you freaky-deaky-bash-anyone-who's-speaks-out-about-the-RRGCCers, if you really want to know...the purpose was to bring the rumors to the surface and pacify those that needed it that the RRGCC was not doing the things folks were assuming them to do. My posts have directly reflected that opinon. But thanks to all the RRGCC representatives, you all have done a GREAT job at creating the "13-year old" environment that you, JB, speak so highly of.TheMayor wrote:...my only thought is that artsay originally wanted facts... then all of a sudden decided she was looking for opinions from users of this board. change your tune, it makes it easier to get worked into a frenzy of anger.
Does he have a strange bear claw like appendage protruding from his neck? He kep petting it.
RRGCC = GOP
Shannon = G.W. Bush
Gretchen = Condi Rice
John = Rumsfield
Static = Ashcroft
Ryan / Dr. Bob = Colin Powell (becuase they are kinda cool).
WMD = Oil crack/Arena
There can be only one way. There canNOT be dissent. We will tell you what we want, when we want. And if we don't say anything, then just assume we are acting in you best intrest.
Wes
Shannon = G.W. Bush
Gretchen = Condi Rice
John = Rumsfield
Static = Ashcroft
Ryan / Dr. Bob = Colin Powell (becuase they are kinda cool).
WMD = Oil crack/Arena
There can be only one way. There canNOT be dissent. We will tell you what we want, when we want. And if we don't say anything, then just assume we are acting in you best intrest.
Wes
"There is no secret ingredient"
Po, the kung fu panda
Po, the kung fu panda