Online guidebook

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
Steve
Posts: 1745
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:34 am

Post by Steve »

In response to HFs ? about what the RRGCC has tried to do with new route approvals.

Last winter the Climbing Advisory Council (CAC) took up the whole new route thing. The FS gave the Coalition the ability to do a blanket route submission packet. This was done to try and speed up the process since the FS, specifically the Stanton Ranger District, is overworked and underfunded. So for a few months people submitted new routes (some routes had been done, others were seeking approval). The CAC organized the paperwork, 'approved' many routes, and passed it on to the Stanton RD in a timely manner. There is sits caught up in the beuracratic bull that is the YOUR US Forest Service. The system is broke and the RRGCC is trying to help fix it. Right now the folks in Winchester are working on a new management plan. By working with the FS and giving them lots of input at their public meetings (another round set to go down early next spring) we can hope to see some changes.
So I don't know if that answers any of your questions, but the RRGCC (specifically the CAC) tried to speed up the route approaval process. Ran into a bump in the road (the FS making the forest management plan a top priority). And seem to be back to square one for now. In the future I think many would like to see the whole process streamlined. Routes at exsisting crags should be easier and ultimately get new crags approved for development.
I see they are still lopping off mountains in Eastern Kentucky. Electricity isn't cheap.
tsparks
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:37 pm

Post by tsparks »

Finally something in this thread that I can wholeheartedly agree with! Ray thank you for the guidebook.
$DO||!$DO; try
try is not a command
Gretchen
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:16 pm

Post by Gretchen »

Ray: I apologize for reacting too soon!

Upon re-reading your post and discussion, I see where you were going with it.

Personally I agree with Lynne, it is time to drop this issue.

You have done a WONDERFUL job with the guide. We still differ on issues but I certainly can live with that. All of your efforts are certainly recognized as very useful and a major contribution & KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK

Peace & Love Brother!
Just genuinely disengenuous.
Johnny
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 9:28 pm

Post by Johnny »

Check your PM Horatio.
JR
Posts: 1128
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 6:18 pm

Post by JR »

Check your BM Johnny.
dingo
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:43 pm

Post by dingo »

Great job Ray!
I can do all things through Christ who strengthen's me.
User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:48 pm

Post by ray »

Thanks.
I'm about halfway done as far as entering route information goes. Still need to do some user interface work too.
I'm still looking for pictures to so send them my way!
Thanks to everyone for what they've sent so far. Snyder sent some cool sport climbing shots from "the day".

My digital camera is getting worked.
deleted username
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 2:25 am

Post by deleted username »

Dude, it is sooooo tempting to edit those routes to include my name as the first ascentionist on all the 2nd FA
:: I may be weak, but I have bad technique!! ::
dingo
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:43 pm

Post by dingo »

JB, you're awful. You'd think you would have learned a lesson from when you were admin. Guess you want payback! :)
I can do all things through Christ who strengthen's me.
User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:48 pm

Post by ray »

Oops. I forgot to turn off editing capabilities.
Post Reply