Which is better?

Posts here will show on front page

Moderator: terrizzi

Which is better?

Muir Valley
24
23%
PMRP
79
77%
 
Total votes: 103

potts
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:16 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by potts »

ray wrote:Which is better overall for a climbing area? From rock quality to atmosphere.
Well, if by "atmosphere" you mean the stench of dog and human shit and piss, poorly kept trails, a godawful access road, insanely noisy dogs and climbers, zero restrooms, and inadequate parking, then there is no contest - the PMRP has all this and more.
User avatar
clif
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:24 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by clif »

why do you hate America?
training is for people who care, i have a job.
sarahinreallife
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:10 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by sarahinreallife »

potts wrote:
ray wrote:Which is better overall for a climbing area? From rock quality to atmosphere.
Well, if by "atmosphere" you mean the stench of dog and human shit and piss, poorly kept trails, a godawful access road, insanely noisy dogs and climbers, zero restrooms, and inadequate parking, then there is no contest - the PMRP has all this and more.
So many lolz.
qmhill
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by qmhill »

I thought Muir was a gym?
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by caribe »

Thank goodness for Muir, an open university.
User avatar
Bum
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:58 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by Bum »

I chose Muir Valley because I like the Amusement Park parking and climbing with Boy Scouts.
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by Meadows »

potts wrote:
ray wrote:Which is better overall for a climbing area? From rock quality to atmosphere.
Well, if by "atmosphere" you mean the stench of dog and human shit and piss, poorly kept trails, a godawful access road, insanely noisy dogs and climbers, zero restrooms, and inadequate parking, then there is no contest - the PMRP has all this and more.
I don't think the Lode was on this poll.

But you're right, there are zero restrooms, which I didn't realize was a requirement for going into the woods.
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by dustonian »

Meadows wrote:But you're right, there are zero restrooms, which I didn't realize was a requirement for going into the woods.
It definitely should be given the extremely high volume of traffic in the PMRP. No environmental impact process in the nation would approve what is going on there. And I am so over walking out of crags with a full bag of garbage clipped to the pack.
Last edited by dustonian on Thu May 30, 2013 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by Meadows »

BTW, why are we comparing land privately owned by a wealthy couple vs. land owned via donations from the climbing community?

Shouldn't it be Muir vs. Torrent or Muir vs. Roadside or Muir vs. HP40; and PMRP vs. (well geez, I haven't visited any climber-owned land outside of PMRP, just government-owned, climber accessible land).
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by Meadows »

dustonian wrote:
Meadows wrote:But you're right, there are zero restrooms, which I didn't realize was a requirement for going into the woods.
It definitely should be given the extremely high volume of traffic in the PMRP. No environmental impact process in the nation would approve what is going on there. And I am so over out of crags with a full bag of garbage clipped to the pack.
According to all the statistics that Weber posts, there isn't that much traffic in the PMRP. :D

Given though that there is in fact a lot of traffic in the PMRP from climbers and the OC, it would be nice to see bathrooms and that has been a discussion in the past on this forum. At the time though, the PMRP mortgage payment was all that could be afforded, and there was concern about vandalism. I'm not sure of current state of affairs or how that it could be possible after seeing the RRGCC kiosk was burned down and the PMRP immediately vandalized. The PMRP doesn't have full-time residents and access to it is from different directions and spread out.
Last edited by Meadows on Thu May 30, 2013 2:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Post Reply