1" webbing tied with a water knot VS. 6 or 7 mm cord tied with triple fisherman's knot???
Please don't tell me to send it back to the manufacturer to re-sling because that's not an option right now!!
Re-slinging Cams
Re-slinging Cams
"Life is a balance of holding on and letting go." ~Keith Urban
Re: Re-slinging Cams
scotch tape works best
Re: Re-slinging Cams
Before sewn slings we used 1" webbing and a water knot. Leave plenty of tail and tighten the knot with full body weight bouncing. That's still probably your strongest option until you can get them re-sewn.
Re: Re-slinging Cams
The webbing option will allow for a little stretch where the cord wont. Id go for the webbing
- cliftongifford
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:57 am
Re: Re-slinging Cams
It doesn't make much difference... go with what you have the most of, or is the cheapest.
Re: Re-slinging Cams
Is cordalette static? If it is, then I'd go with the webbing 100%.terrizzi wrote:The webbing option will allow for a little stretch where the cord wont. Id go for the webbing
Re: Re-slinging Cams
Yes more static then webbing. Webbing is pretty dynamic.
Have you ever tightened or walked a slackline?
Have you ever tightened or walked a slackline?
I don't have haters, I have fans in denial.
- cliftongifford
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:57 am
Re: Re-slinging Cams
When you're talking about only a few inches of material, stretch doesn't come into play. The reduction of force during a fall is attributed to a dynamic rope and a good belayer, not what type of material you sling your cams with. Many cam companies use spectra/dyneema on their cams, that's about as static as it gets.
Re: Re-slinging Cams
Here is a cool article from BD thats discussing re-slinging your gear.
http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/en ... s-and-c3s/
The thought on surface area when loaded is particularly interesting. Ive herd chatter from techs from companies evaluating some serious downfalls from spectra/dyneema slings when drop tower tests are preformed. Mainly that while spectra/dyneema have a higher static strength when compared to tubular webbing its melting point is much lower, and when girth hitched or slung incorrectly (doubled alpine draws) the friction applied from just a couple falls can cause melting and failure of the spectra/dyneema. Apparently that is why the DMM Dragons have that nifty tail piece.
http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/en ... s-and-c3s/
The thought on surface area when loaded is particularly interesting. Ive herd chatter from techs from companies evaluating some serious downfalls from spectra/dyneema slings when drop tower tests are preformed. Mainly that while spectra/dyneema have a higher static strength when compared to tubular webbing its melting point is much lower, and when girth hitched or slung incorrectly (doubled alpine draws) the friction applied from just a couple falls can cause melting and failure of the spectra/dyneema. Apparently that is why the DMM Dragons have that nifty tail piece.
Re: Re-slinging Cams
It's not about everyday use--it's about those rare occasions that we like to think we "control" for.cliftongifford wrote:When you're talking about only a few inches of material, stretch doesn't come into play. The reduction of force during a fall is attributed to a dynamic rope and a good belayer, not what type of material you sling your cams with.
Imagine a factor 2 fall directly on a poorly equalized anchor--a tiny bit of stretch may be the difference between the whole thing blowing or holding. Even with a couple of inches, the amount of shock load can be much lower with a little stretch.