Tower of Power Repeated!

Placing a cam? Slotting a nut? Slinging a tree?
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by climb2core »

Classic.
User avatar
clif
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:24 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by clif »

some consider ron jeremy a legend
training is for people who care, i have a job.
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by toad857 »

He has a tiny pecker ....but I guess all things are relative.
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by LK Day »

Wikipedia says this: "The word classic means something that is a perfect example of a particular style, something of lasting worth or with a timeless quality." I'd say that fits perfectly - no need to misinterpret. For me Tower of Power is a classic example of old school, devil may care, red river gorge adventure climbing - where we sought out the steepest, most outrageous looking thing we thought we could lead and climbed it, no projecting, no drilled anchors, no whining, no excuses.
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by toad857 »

toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by toad857 »

More routes should have hype & lore, though.

It's a shame when an awesome, epic route is FA'ed... and then its description reads like stereo instructions. Do a good route justice and write a description that invokes magic, dragons, blurred vision, billy goats, nudity, etc. Give all of us toilet-readers something interesting while we're on the pot.
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by LK Day »

It's obvious that "classic" means something at least a little different to all of us. I like what Bill Strachan said: "To me the number of people who have climbed a route has nothing to do with whether it is a classic. The aesthetic of the line itself, the moves, and its' place in the history and development of an area are what is important in defining a classic."

And Toad's right. We need more hype, more lore.
User avatar
One-Fall
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:27 am

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by One-Fall »

SCIN wrote:Is it really a classic if only 5 people have climbed it?
I know where you are going with this, Ray, but I'm going to misinterpret you on purpose.
Mercy the Huff would still be classic if only 5 people had climbed it, no?
Can't we all just get along?
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by SCIN »

Sorry guys, it's hard to write hype and lore for 60 foot sport climbs. Have at it though. There are no barriers to entry in the RRG guidebook market.

Lee, only 10 years later would it be a classic because enough time would have passed to trick the younger climbers into believing that.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Tower of Power Repeated!

Post by toad857 »

SCIN wrote:Sorry guys, it's hard to write hype and lore for 60 foot sport climbs.
You're just not drunk enough.
Post Reply