Decking at the Lode...

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Saxman »

Shit Larry, I can't spray about my previous send and drink my latte while belaying without an assisted braking device.
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
EricDorsey
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:52 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by EricDorsey »

LK Day wrote:Please forgive my ignorance on this subject, but I have a very basic question, having retired from climbing before mechanically complex body breaking devices came into fashion. What was wrong with simple belay devices like the ATC and why did people quit using them? Is paying out slack with an ATC such an arduous task that it makes sport climbing all but impossible? Just wondering.
Personally I like being belayed with a device like a grigri because it gives me a little extra peace of mind my belayer wont drop me... Of course ANY belay device used incorrectly is going to be unsafe so I make sure my belayer knows how to use it. But who knows stuff can happen(rock fall, bee sting, hot girl etc) that would make a belayer lose their grip and an assisted locking device like a grigri just makes me feel more comfortable than an ATC. Personal preference though I guess...

I also like belaying more with a grigri because if the climber is going to take and hang out at a bolt its a lot easier for me to hold them with a grigri than an ATC. Obviously I can still hold a climber with an ATC but a grigri is just easier. Not to mention its easier to turn up the volume on my Ipod or adjust my hammock if I have two free hands.

While were on the topic of mechanically complex devices what was wrong with all passive pro and a swami belt??? Are those fancy new cams and padded harnesses REALLY needed? And ropes are made out of nylon these days!?
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Post by LK Day »

Wow, as clear an advance as nylon ropes, harnesses and cams! I guess it really is next to impossible to climb without them. But seriously, it's about convenience and the feeling that you're less likely to be dropped by a distracted belayer. I get it. The distracted belayer bit is a little sad though, isn't it.
User avatar
Josephine
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:38 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Josephine »

I prefer to be belayed with a gri-gri when I'm working a route. When being belayed with an ATC, if I'm up high and say "take" often times the belayer just locks me off and I go down several feet. (I realize this is bad belay technique, but for people that only belay with ATC this is fairly standard practice). The problem with going down several feet is I usually try to go in-direct to the bolt - I am no longer at the bolt and must reclimb whatever hard section I just went through. I had one belayer and we repeated this about 5 or 6 times before I gave up and decided if she must want to hold me up there rather than have me go in direct.

I've never worried about a distracted belayer. I guess I just have great partners :-D

I also prefer a gri-gri when belaying new climbers on TR. Often times brand new climbers or kids just want to make it to the top. I can put extra tension on the rope and help them up a bit.
"Unthinkably good things can happen, even late in the game." ~ Under the Tuscan Sun
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by LK Day »

And there's the heart of the matter "GRIGRI - the hangdogger's friend". Thanks, Josephine.
JR
Posts: 1128
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 6:18 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by JR »

You've been dying for that dinger, Day!!!!!!!

I would like to defend the hangdoggers though, especially Josephine. She is an awesome hangdog! Hangdoggers still climb more pitches in day than Traddies.

Side note: This might just be lazy too, but you can belay quite nicely off an anchor(multi-pitch) with a GriGri. I have a feeling you already know this shit but where playing coy to make fun of the clunky locky belay devices.
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by LK Day »

Oh shit, busted - and in record time! Time to 'fess up. I know full well what grigris and similar devices are about, and their advantages when "working" a route. But man, you've got to admit the old school term "hangdogging" is so much more colorful and the imagery so much better than "working". Innovative gear and tactics are all part of pushing standards higher and higher, there's no way the average climber of today would be putting up such big numbers without clunky belay devices and lots of "hangdogging". It's all part of the evolution, (or devolution) of climbing. :) I've got no problem with it, really. But lugging a grigri along on a multipitch climb, now that's blasphemy.
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by toad857 »

LK Day wrote:But lugging a grigri along on a multipitch climb, now that's blasphemy.
Yeah. Just like using a can opener on my tuna in lieu of bashing it with a rock and sucking out the juices the ol' fashioned way.
LK Day
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:47 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by LK Day »

LK Day wrote: But lugging a grigri along on a multipitch climb, now that's blasphemy.
And it's pussyfied.
EricDorsey
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:52 pm

Re:

Post by EricDorsey »

LK Day wrote:Wow, as clear an advance as nylon ropes, harnesses and cams! I guess it really is next to impossible to climb without them. But seriously, it's about convenience and the feeling that you're less likely to be dropped by a distracted belayer. I get it. The distracted belayer bit is a little sad though, isn't it.
No its not only about convience and distracted belayers, that is not what I said... Unless you count getting knocked unconcious by a rock a distraction?? Or my buddy who is allergic to bees going into anaphylactic shock also a distraction? I know pretty unlikely but it could happen. Really the main reason for me is the added safety, if used properly, and I just find them easier to belay with than an ATC. Again personal preference.

Either way seems as if you are set in your ways and dont want to listen to the reasons people like them so I wont waste my breath. I would think there must be some benifit seeing as how they are about 4 times as expensive as ATC's yet almost everyone has one... Must be because we are all lazy climbers :D
Last edited by EricDorsey on Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Post Reply