Decking at the Lode...

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by toad857 »

10.5 is old-geezer style. Hip kids use a nano 8.6 now. It's tre' cool.
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Saxman »

How susceptible is the SUM to dirt clogging up the mechanism?
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
TradMike
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:57 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by TradMike »

toad857 wrote:10.5 is old-geezer style. Hip kids use a nano 8.6 now. It's tre' cool.
The nano and sum seem to be pushing the limits a bit much vs. the old tried and true more simple designs. Not that advancements are good but you can take it a bit too far. I have cut a 10.5 down to the bone before and had it been an 8.6 I'm not sure it would have turned out so well. I have not problem rolling geezer style.
Howie Feltersnatch
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:16 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Howie Feltersnatch »

Meadows wrote: Art has in the recent past "happily" whipped all over my SUM too.
I can't read that without it sending my mind in the gutter.
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by caribe »

Howie Feltersnatch wrote:
Meadows wrote: Art has in the recent past "happily" whipped all over my SUM too.
I can't read that without it sending my mind in the gutter.
Image
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by dustonian »

Sir Arthur is one of the happiest whippers I know.
User avatar
steep4me
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:18 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by steep4me »

Man, these things really freak me out. My list of partners is narrowing each season. No SUMs and no. Cinches. Every single incident involving a gri gri or ATC had to do with pilot error. If there is ANY chance that a competent belayer could have their hand on the brake and deck me anyway....I'm not willing to take that risk. :shock:
Hauling a big ego up a route adds at least a full grade.
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Meadows »

The jury is still out folks ... it could've been pilot error.
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Andrew »

I think the point that people are trying to make is that the SUM is a device that... because of its design provides many opportunities for it to not work (pilot error) and eventually stops working over time.
Living the dream
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Re: Decking at the Lode...

Post by Meadows »

I can relate to that and awhile ago, I remember the exact words being spoken from ATC users about the grigri. I even switched back to the ATC after witnessing an incident on Mercy in '06 in which I was told that the cam on the grigri failed to engage.

But because I love the SUM and have caught many of falls with it (with I feel better friction than the gri), I want to understand the situation.
Post Reply