and, if you have such a problem with people engaging in non-normative gender expression then might i ask you what advice you would have for the millions of people born with ambiguous genitalia of one fashion or another? that is, they may look like a "dude" but not have complete dude parts. should they pretend they don't exist? should they just pick whatever gender they most look like so as not to offend your sensibilities?
and, if you so desire gender conformity in appearance then why not demand it in behavior? should women stop all this business of desiring careers and success in the formal economy? how am i supposed to explain to my children that mommy wants to work?[/quote]
I have a problem with people driving 65 in the fast lane on I 75 with Ohio license plate, that affects me directly, not homo's. As far as ambiguous genitalia, It is a physical defect not the same of homosexuals, sodomist, child rapist, or those that engage in beastiality. As far as your rant about woman power, weak. My wife is a powerful, educated beautiful women who usually beats my ass if i get out of line.
LK Day should weigh in
Re: LK Day should weigh in
my intention was not to craft a "strong" argument, but to point out your logical inconsistency. also, saying those people have a physical defect and then moving on sidesteps the issue. the point is that for a lot of people gender presentation won't match whatever their gonads are (or are not). and, you were "ranting" about waiters with pink fingernails (or whatever). it is your fragile, dichotomous visioin of gender that needs to change, not the way that those people act and dress. i won't hold my breath, but what i will anticipate is cohort replacement!
also, to be clear, i have no beef with you personally (not that you'd care anyways). lots of people hold your opinions and it is those that i find odious. i'm sure you're a perfectly nice guy.
also, to be clear, i have no beef with you personally (not that you'd care anyways). lots of people hold your opinions and it is those that i find odious. i'm sure you're a perfectly nice guy.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
i wasnt side stepping but rather categorizing. I categorize homosexuals and the act of homosexuality with rapist,sodomist, incest, beastiality or any other form of sexual relationship that doesnt fit the norm. I really dont care how one dress's in public or the "closet". And yes, Id like to think im a pretty nice guy, Id give two homos a ride if there car broke down, i just dont want to see them skankin it up in my back seat.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
yet, deep inside someplace, you do want to see it... and we accept that about you.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
I quite liked Ron Paul's views on Iran in last night's debate.
I think if any of the other republican candidates win election we'll be at war with iran in 6 months.
I think if any of the other republican candidates win election we'll be at war with iran in 6 months.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
nice try shamis
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
Re: LK Day should weigh in
dustonian wrote:yet, deep inside someplace, you do want to see it... and we accept that about you.
what community is this "we" that you represent. Just so I know who im receiving this acceptance from.
On a Friendly note, heres a good laugh for both sides
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=878mBvDrhVg
Re: LK Day should weigh in
Really. Rapists?ted wrote:I categorize homosexuals and the act of homosexuality with rapist,sodomist, incest, beastiality or any other form of sexual relationship that doesnt fit the norm.
Jesus doesn't have room for intolerance like that. You're goin to hell, bro.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
"You're a long way from home now, Buddy" - Ted kindly pointing out a ran out mess.