LK Day should weigh in
Re: LK Day should weigh in
I have to admit the occupy thing was a bit of a letdown. A ton of momentum was generated behind what wanted to be a cause, but never materialized.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
Term limits for elected officials, no pensions, take the yearn to gain and replace it with the desire to serve, just a thought, seems the only thing congress can agree on is a pay and benefit package before they bolt out the door to decry gridlock... The constitution defines the role of each branch of the government, read the thing and apply appropriately. Consider raising the compensation package for the POTUS, we might get someone willing to do for the money because this piece of garbage we have now shows what $400k will buy you...
Re: LK Day should weigh in
krampus wrote:Just out of curiosity, do you think of your mom with her legs in the air and your dad's big smiling thrusting mustache everytime you see old people. If not, then I think you might have some repressed desire to touch a man impurely, especially the fabulous men.ted wrote:
Nope, but im sure i could picture myself between your moms legs, beating it like it owed me money! zing! HA! Way to think outside the box champ! If that's the only example you could come up with,it appears your curiosity is a little limited.
-
FaggyMcFagFag
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:42 pm
Re: LK Day should weigh in
Wow, apparently I’ve been climbing at the wrong crags, running on the wrong trails, shopping at the wrong Wal-Marts, etc. I can’t think of the last time I was reminded of hot man-on-man action while hanging out in south eastern Kentucky. (We homos can smell each other, you know. It's pretty rare I see any in these parts. And the few I do see keep a pretty low profile.) Are you one of those people who sees a group of guys going bouldering and thinks they’re carrying mattresses into the woods for a big ol’ homo orgy?ted wrote:I would stop thinking about it, but, im reminded every time i go out to eat, walmart, watch t.v., go climb, go for a trail run, whatever! I dont feel like explaining to my daughter how two guys (or women) can make babies, or why the fella waiting our table has painted finger nails and woman mannerism's. Kinda freakish, you know! I never said i was rude to them, just that i dont agree with it, sorry if you like the dick bruh
At least we can agree on a couple things: big hairy dudes getting it on is kinda gross. I hate it when I'm looking at man porn and I come across fat dudes with back hair and nipple rings and all that shit. Ewwwww! I prefer skinny guys without much body hair. And painted fingernails are a bit weird. Maybe President Perry can pass a law banning guys from painting their fingernails. I’m pretty sure that the Constitution gives him that power.
Thank you for refraining from being rude to the gay people who apparently surround you everywhere you go.
Finally, using apostrophes to form plurals (e.g., mannerism’s) is clearly an abomination. Omitting apostrophes (e.g., im) is far less obnoxious. Sorry, just a peeve.
Have a fabulous day!
Re: LK Day should weigh in
Seriously though, does walking through walmart make you think of that "jazzy" sextape?ted wrote:Nope, but im sure i could picture myself between your moms legs, beating it like it owed me money! zing! HA! Way to think outside the box champ! If that's the only example you could come up with,it appears your curiosity is a little limited.
does a trail run give you nightmares of the discovery chanel?
eating out brings you face down in the mashed potatas? (pretty sure that was another old people joke, not entirely sure though)
Its funny though, based on your aggressive internet dialect, and childlike fear of something misunderstood. I'd say you are a christian.
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
Re: LK Day should weigh in
krampus wrote:Seriously though, does walking through walmart make you think of that "jazzy" sextape?ted wrote:Nope, but im sure i could picture myself between your moms legs, beating it like it owed me money! zing! HA! Way to think outside the box champ! If that's the only example you could come up with,it appears your curiosity is a little limited.
does a trail run give you nightmares of the discovery chanel?
eating out brings you face down in the mashed potatas? (pretty sure that was another old people joke, not entirely sure though)
Its funny though, based on your aggressive internet dialect, and childlike fear of something misunderstood. I'd say you are a christian.
By being reminded, I dont mean traumatically stressed, I simply mean seeing more and more homosexuals publicly. For example the female duo walking through wal mart, One wearing catepillar work boots with jeans and t shirt sporting a nice short spiked hair do holding hands with her more traditionally dressed female partner. Eating at B dubs and the fella waiting your table with some kick ass french tip finger nails and walking with a little extra spunk. It does seem like it is becoming a little more socially accepted. I can dig it, I dont agree with it, but ill still take a bullet in a foreign country for the flamer. Aggressive dialect? Im pretty sure i made one statement "that I disagree with homo's" while talking about how shitty the lineup of candidates for the republican party is. If that's aggressive, feel free to slander me for preferring vagina. As far as my christian faith being involved, I cant find anything that condemns homosexuals to hell or anything else, I am no better then they are, that argument just doesnt hold water. But whether you believe in religion or evolution, i Just dont think its right. We didnt evolve by two men having a baby did we? Some may argue consent, well, I bet a billy goat wouldnt mind, so why not allow Beastiality. Why dont we just leave incest rednecks and polygamist alone and let the pedophiles out of prison. These are different circumstances but all driven by the same twisted, disgusting lust and i see no difference in either .
On an end note, I have no beef with homosexuals. I just dont agree with the act nor can I wrap my head around how someone can justify a same sex sexual relationship with out buying into all the other sick stuff out there
Re: LK Day should weigh in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual ... in_animals
"One species in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."[9]"
Turns out you are right, Ted, a billy goat might not mind!
"One species in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."[9]"
Turns out you are right, Ted, a billy goat might not mind!
Last edited by bcombs on Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LK Day should weigh in
if your argument is that for sex to be "right" it must lead to procreation ("we didn't evolve from two men having a baby did we?") then i assume you also consider condoms, oral sex, and masturbation to be disagreeable. i mean, we didn't evolve by getting blowies after all.
and, if you have such a problem with people engaging in non-normative gender expression then might i ask you what advice you would have for the millions of people born with ambiguous genitalia of one fashion or another? that is, they may look like a "dude" but not have complete dude parts. should they pretend they don't exist? should they just pick whatever gender they most look like so as not to offend your sensibilities?
and, if you so desire gender conformity in appearance then why not demand it in behavior? should women stop all this business of desiring careers and success in the formal economy? how am i supposed to explain to my children that mommy wants to work?
and, if you have such a problem with people engaging in non-normative gender expression then might i ask you what advice you would have for the millions of people born with ambiguous genitalia of one fashion or another? that is, they may look like a "dude" but not have complete dude parts. should they pretend they don't exist? should they just pick whatever gender they most look like so as not to offend your sensibilities?
and, if you so desire gender conformity in appearance then why not demand it in behavior? should women stop all this business of desiring careers and success in the formal economy? how am i supposed to explain to my children that mommy wants to work?