It's just a (fill in the blank) route, it's not that bad

Discussions full of RAGE!
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

It's just a (fill in the blank) route, it's not that bad

Post by SCIN »

Man, ya know what I hear a lot that's kind of strange?
When people are referring to a route they can't do and they say things like:

a) It's really not that bad, it's just an endurance route or
b) It's really not that bad, it's just a couple of hard moves or
c) It's really not that bad, it's just kind of technical

I mean, isn't the whole challenge of sending a route usually linking up all of the moves in one go without falling? Isn't that what gives a route a higher grade? How can any of the three main ingredients of a hard rating be downplayed in such a manner?

I think the one I hear most is:
a) It's really not that bad, it's just an endurance problem

Man, endurance is probably one of the most time consuming aspects of physical strength to build. It may take a person a year to build the kind of endurance needed to send the route they're saying "isn't that bad because it's an endurance problem".
t bone
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 10:56 pm

Post by t bone »

Right on scin. i could not have said it better!!
Winterstorm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 2:27 pm

Post by Winterstorm »

Right you are Mr. Kotter...I've been climbing about 3 years with a few breaks as long as several months in that time span. My endurance is better than it was when I started but it still sucks like gravity. Of course my training program being what it is, practically non-existent, has a lot to do with that. Improvement in technique and balance has come a lot quicker than endurance by a long shot.
scars are tattoos with better stories
Danny
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 7:20 pm

Post by Danny »

definitely! to do a route you have to get to the top without falling period. what always drives me nuts is when people insist a route is rated based on the single hardest move. that is obviously not the case for most of the routes in the red, especially the ones that are overhanging. this may be the case for some routes where you can take a smoke break between cruxes but it's certainly not true for ALL routes. everyone has strengths and weaknesses and every route is unique so just do your best to get up the fucker without falling!
andy_lemon
Posts: 1566
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:22 am

Post by andy_lemon »

Hey, the route is real easy until I fall. :lol:
TRAD-SEEKER
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:51 pm

Post by TRAD-SEEKER »

Danny, you are such a good speaker. You seriously are my hero!
I JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH CRACK!
Horatio Felacio
Posts: 3338
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 7:26 pm

Post by Horatio Felacio »

if routes in the red were based on the single hardest move, the hardest route would be v3.
Yo HO!! Just got me a code red and some funyons big dawg!!! SHIT YEAH! - Ray, excited about his breakfast
JR
Posts: 1128
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 6:18 pm

Post by JR »

Those are just classic sport wiennie complaints.
Here are a couple of boulderer wiennie no send rebuttals.
a)The holds are greasy.
b)The feet suck on this problem.
c)It is to reachy.

And the everpopular gear placing pussy.
a)I Should have taped up.
b)I should have not taped up.
c)That is not a crack climb, that is face climb with gear.
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Post by ynot »

I should have taped is only a legitimate complaint if your hands are really bloody.
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
Lateralus
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 10:14 pm

Post by Lateralus »

I ran into an "acquaintance" who finally made it to the Red and he just couldn't quit spraying about not doing any hard moves in the Red on any of the 11's or .12's he sampled. On and on, well after my eyes glazed over and I'd used up all my oxygen reserved for sighing, I asked him what .12s he managed to send while there.

Silence

"It's just endurance climbing man". He said.

pfft!
Post Reply