PDs at Lode

Posts here will show on front page

Moderator: terrizzi

Most Permadraws stripped from Lode today. What do YOU think??

Good
50
28%
Bad
111
61%
[FART!]
20
11%
 
Total votes: 181

lena_chita
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:48 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by lena_chita »

flashmaster wrote:All draws have been stripped except for the cave and a handful of other routes. PDs have been left on the majority of routes on the undertow for safe cleaning and on all anchors. The hardware that has been stripped has all been labeled and is at Miguel's(the Venturas have had no involvement in this by the way) so if you own any of the hardware you can come claim it there.
Where you one of the people who stripped the PDs? Any explanation for the reasons behind it?
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by climb2core »

Lack of the PD's will not decrease traffic. The absence will create more booty though.

Kafish2. You can't compare A6 to the Lode. They amount of traffic the draws will see is miniscule compared to the all day traffic the Lode gets every day of the week.
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by Andrew »

climb2core wrote:Lack of the PD's will not decrease traffic. The absence will create more booty though.

Kafish2. You can't compare A6 to the Lode. They amount of traffic the draws will see is miniscule compared to the all day traffic the Lode gets every day of the week.

I think you are missing his point
Living the dream
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by climb2core »

Andrew wrote:
climb2core wrote:Lack of the PD's will not decrease traffic. The absence will create more booty though.

Kafish2. You can't compare A6 to the Lode. They amount of traffic the draws will see is miniscule compared to the all day traffic the Lode gets every day of the week.

I think you are missing his point
And what would that be? IMO, apples and oranges. You cannot compare project draws on a route at a private secret crag to the same at the Lode.
AlexAndEr
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:35 am

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by AlexAndEr »

What is happening to the steel draws that were bought with donations?
@@@
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:56 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by @@@ »

I find it hard to believe someone went though the trouble to strip all of those draws. If so, how about go put them back.
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by climb2core »

I would love to have been sitting at that campfire listening to the logic that empowered this group to become the Lode fixed gear Nazi's.
User avatar
Pumpkin
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:13 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by Pumpkin »

Andrew wrote:

climb2core wrote:Lack of the PD's will not decrease traffic. The absence will create more booty though.

Kafish2. You can't compare A6 to the Lode. They amount of traffic the draws will see is miniscule compared to the all day traffic the Lode gets every day of the week.




I think you are missing his point



And what would that be? IMO, apples and oranges. You cannot compare project draws on a route at a private secret crag to the same at the Lode.
I think the point is: why is pigsteak okay with having perma draws for his ease and convenience at his secret crag but not okay with them being at public areas for everyone's ease and convenience. It is kind of hard to be for perma draws in one area and against them in others.
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by climb2core »

Pumpkin wrote:
Andrew wrote:

climb2core wrote:Lack of the PD's will not decrease traffic. The absence will create more booty though.

Kafish2. You can't compare A6 to the Lode. They amount of traffic the draws will see is miniscule compared to the all day traffic the Lode gets every day of the week.




I think you are missing his point



And what would that be? IMO, apples and oranges. You cannot compare project draws on a route at a private secret crag to the same at the Lode.
I think the point is: why is pigsteak okay with having perma draws for his ease and convenience at his secret crag but not okay with them being at public areas for everyone's ease and convenience. It is kind of hard to be for perma draws in one area and against them in others.
That is easy... 1.) Safety: Do you think you will find ginsu biners at A6? There will never be the same traffic on them 2.) Ownership. Everyone knows who's route and draws those are at A6. If it is on a red tagged project, no one else is climbing it. If it has recently been sent, they have been left up by the FA for his select friends to enjoy. 3.) You have to know that Pigsteak lives in a world of dichotomy... he is always speaking out of both sides of his mouth. ;)
User avatar
Pumpkin
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:13 pm

Re: PDs at Lode

Post by Pumpkin »

Yes, but the point of the perma draws at the lode was to increase safety. That is why they were steel. Now we are just back to everyone putting up aluminum biners again, and probably contributing to more unsafe conditions. Also, with ownership what is the difference between someone putting up their draws for their select friends versus someone putting up their draws knowing that everyone will climb on them. Secret crags are not "owned" by the person who found them...they are just not public knowledge. And of course piggie plays both sides...
Post Reply