krampus wrote:true, but if they don't re-open roadside, is it so obscene to think that the land owners deserve the restoration grant to counter years of unchecked abuse. "$5,000 to help build trails on your land so we can climb there in the future", is not that much different than "Thanks for letting us crap all over your property for 20 years, here is some cash and manpower to help rebuild what we destroyed"
Obsene -- no. But does it fit with the goals of Access Fund? What message does it send? "Here landowners, if you close your place to climbers, we'll give you some money to top it off, we don't mind?"
Besides, lets be real, what sort of rebuilding does Roadside need if it is to stay closed? -- If you don't do anything at all to Roadside, and just keep it closed, in about one year you won't even be able to find a trail. Poison ivy hardly requires help to grow.