Safety first, Canadians second

Discussions full of RAGE!
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by climb2core »

pigsteak wrote:lowering from anchors is lazy form. who is paying for the replacement costs? not just the hardware, but someone elses time to go behind you and clean up your mess. you want to lower, then leave a biner every time
Umm, I am lazy. That is why I sport climb... duh!
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by Shamis »

pigsteak wrote:lowering from anchors is lazy form. who is paying for the replacement costs? not just the hardware, but someone elses time to go behind you and clean up your mess. you want to lower, then leave a biner every time
Confirming that pigsteak always raps.
allah
Posts: 1443
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:10 am

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by allah »

Seen Piggy Lower! :)
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by ynot »

I found aluminum rings on trad routes at the Red a couple times. the ring around the inside and the weight is the giveaway. I don't trust them. Even a cheap quiklink is better.
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
Isaac McShane
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:14 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by Isaac McShane »

allah wrote:OK Well then it is different for you than other climbers. Since you are a large beast and she was probably 100 pounds lighter than you then she feels safe lowering through the anchors. If you feel the need to Rap, so be it. If she feels the need to lower through perfectly safe rings, so be it. Sometimes if someone is doing something you wouldn't do, and they are being safe about it, then you might just want to keep quiet about your opinion. Rapping and lowering on a sport route with chains/rings/quick links is up to the climber, its not up to the peanut gallery.
Your freedom ends where mine begins. What I mean by that is if someone wants to jeopardize their safety, that's their decision, and I won't police the area. But if every 100lb person feels safe lowering through rap rings, eventually the same damage will be done that a fraction of us large beasts are capable of. Then I get up there and see ruined rap rings, which is now jeopardizing my safety, and that ain't cool. Maybe I want to get drunk and stoned before I go climbing. It's moronic, but it's my choice and it doesn't affect anyone else, right? What about when I fall 60 feet and land on your head? If you don't want to play by the rules perhaps you shouldn't visit public areas. That's what I think at least.
“Over time, our only chance at safety will depend on not turning the mountains into Disneyland.”

-Reinhold Messner
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by dustonian »

Then replace the rap rings if they're unsafe, fool! Do you have any idea how much hardware allah (Kenny) has donated to the Red over the years? Try rap-cleaning a route steeper than 15-20 degrees and you'll drop the moralizing pretty quick.
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by climb2core »

Isaac McShane wrote:
allah wrote:OK Well then it is different for you than other climbers. Since you are a large beast and she was probably 100 pounds lighter than you then she feels safe lowering through the anchors. If you feel the need to Rap, so be it. If she feels the need to lower through perfectly safe rings, so be it. Sometimes if someone is doing something you wouldn't do, and they are being safe about it, then you might just want to keep quiet about your opinion. Rapping and lowering on a sport route with chains/rings/quick links is up to the climber, its not up to the peanut gallery.
Your freedom ends where mine begins. What I mean by that is if someone wants to jeopardize their safety, that's their decision, and I won't police the area. But if every 100lb person feels safe lowering through rap rings, eventually the same damage will be done that a fraction of us large beasts are capable of. Then I get up there and see ruined rap rings, which is now jeopardizing my safety, and that ain't cool. Maybe I want to get drunk and stoned before I go climbing. It's moronic, but it's my choice and it doesn't affect anyone else, right? What about when I fall 60 feet and land on your head? If you don't want to play by the rules perhaps you shouldn't visit public areas. That's what I think at least.
I believe the consensus is that the last person cleaning on belay is currently acceptable ethics in the Red. Some people don't feel safe rapping and cleaning, others don't know how to, and many routes are steep making it more challenging. It is your responsibility to inspect fixed gear and make the appropriate decision for you. I always have a leave biner on my harness and could use that if needed.

I really think some guidelines for local crag ethics should be developed by the local experts and put into print into the guidebook to clarify and lay down some do's and don'ts...
User avatar
cliftongifford
Posts: 649
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:57 am

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by cliftongifford »

climb2core wrote:
I really think some guidelines for local crag ethics should be developed by the local experts and put into print into the guidebook to clarify and lay down some do's and don'ts...
+1
dustonian wrote:Try rap-cleaning a route steeper than 15-20 degrees and you'll drop the moralizing pretty quick.
I agree that this is the fastest most efficient method, and something I sometimes do when people are waiting on steeper routes, but it undoubtedly wears on fixed gear. Another less convenient method is to have your partner or yourself clean the route on TR, then it makes no difference how steep the wall is. Of course, somebody's climbing on top-rope, and I'm not sure how cool that is...
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by Andrew »

cliftongifford wrote:
climb2core wrote:
I really think some guidelines for local crag ethics should be developed by the local experts and put into print into the guidebook to clarify and lay down some do's and don'ts...
+1
dustonian wrote:Try rap-cleaning a route steeper than 15-20 degrees and you'll drop the moralizing pretty quick.
I agree that this is the fastest most efficient method, and something I sometimes do when people are waiting on steeper routes, but it undoubtedly wears on fixed gear. Another less convenient method is to have your partner or yourself clean the route on TR, then it makes no difference how steep the wall is. Of course, somebody's climbing on top-rope, and I'm not sure how cool that is...

Who would agree to cleaning on top-rope?
Living the dream
User avatar
krampus
Posts: 3933
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:31 am

Re: Safety first, Canadians second

Post by krampus »

-1
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
Post Reply