The anatomy of a overused crag?

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by SCIN »

My point exactly. Easy is way too subjective to punish an entire group with.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by Toad »

Here's my thoughts (such as they are)

New climbers are by nature beginners. They will seek easy routes. The higher the concentration of routes, the more newbies will come. They will bring more newbies. I'm thinking the less beginners are catered to, the less likely they are to show up more than a few times before they get frustrated and quit. Hopefully, less easy routes will foster a mentor relationship with more experienced climbers that should know how not to fuck things up if the newbie is serious about climbing.
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
User avatar
bcombs
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 4:20 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by bcombs »

Toad wrote:Here's my thoughts (such as they are)

New climbers are by nature beginners. They will seek easy routes. The higher the concentration of routes, the more newbies will come. They will bring more newbies. I'm thinking the less beginners are catered to, the less likely they are to show up more than a few times before they get frustrated and quit. Hopefully, less easy routes will foster a mentor relationship with more experienced climbers that should know how not to fuck things up if the newbie is serious about climbing.
In general I might agree with you, especially ~10+ years ago. There are too many outdoor newbies who need no mentoring in sport climbing and who crush, but have zero ideals about outdoor ethics. So I don't know that we can assume that all the bad actors are climbing a specific grade and under.
gripster
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:43 am

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by gripster »

In all fairness, some of the nastiest crags i have seen only have concentrations of 5.11 and harder routes. examples: bob marley and motherload have more shit and toilet paper than i have seen anywhere else (i am sure there are counter examples, but still).
gripster
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:43 am

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by gripster »

sorry, just saw your comment bcombs, that might explain my observation
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by Toad »

True about some newbies coming out of the gym climbing harder that I ever have or will. I don't claim to have the answers, but nothing is going to change unless something gets started somewhere. I don't think the world will end if we were to choose not to develop easy routes. If nothing changes in a few years, then go back and bolt them.
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by Shamis »

I think the approach and quality of the routes is about it.

You could probably write a formula: number of 4 star routes *distance from miguels * distance from parking area= how crowded it is.
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by ynot »

bingo. we have a winner
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
User avatar
bcombs
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 4:20 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by bcombs »

Shamis wrote:I think the approach and quality of the routes is about it.

You could probably write a formula: number of 4 star routes *distance from miguels * distance from parking area= how crowded it is.
This is a good point. I'll restrict my comments to moderates, let's say 10d and under. Regarding quality, do you think it is perceived quality based on guidebook / online ratings only? In other words, for the majority of these folks, could they tell a 2 star 10a from a 4 star one? Obviously there are the standout routes that everyone knows are great, but in general. I'll give you an example, Unbridled at the unlode: http://www.redriverclimbing.com/RRCGuid ... te&id=1091 If we took 10 climbers who all climb in the 10+ range and took them out there, with no prior knowledge of the route, and then took a survey when they were done, what would the consensus be? My thinking is that it would be neutral to positive and star ratings in the 3-4 range. Because the route, regardless of true rock quality, was challenging for them. To me, that's why we are out there, to be challenged. In real life, 10 climbers probably haven't visited that route in total. :) I'm just sort of thinking out loud here... It seems like we could bolt more moderate moderates and spread out those crowds hording the 5 star moderates.
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: The anatomy of a overused crag?

Post by climb2core »

Wish we could put up rolling counter for crags like Roadside at the base of the trail. Basically two rollers with numbers 0 through 9 on each.. If you are going to the crag, you just add the number of climbers climbing at it... On a sign above is max crag allowance. Once it hits that number you walk away. Then on your way out, just reduce your number again. People wouldn't follow it, or may even artificially increase it to have it for themselves... but in a perfect world, it would be a simple solution to overcrowding.

Maybe put a camera on it with a live feed to Miguels... that might keep people honest.
Post Reply