Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
GWG
Posts: 840
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 1:45 pm

Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by GWG »

A climber fell from the anchor point of the first pitch of Middle Earth at the gunks this past Saturday. Fortunately, he survived with what appears to be some broken bones.

Details appear to be that after arriving at the anchor tree, he set it up as a top rope and then proceeded to lean back to be lowered. The belayer had taken him off belay. The first pitch of Middle Earth is about 100' and the fact that it is mostly slab, the guy didn't freefall all the way to the ground.

There's an extensive discussion taking place on rockclimbing.com:

http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/for ... _collapsed;

A couple of take aways from this incident:

1. Weight the rope before going off direct at the anchors

2. Have clear expectations of both the climber and belayer before leaving the ground

3. Communicate

Hope everyone has a great weekend at Rocktoberfest. Wish I were there.

GWG
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by Shamis »

GWG wrote:1. Weight the rope before going off direct at the anchors
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by toad857 »

Someone correct me if this is not accurate:

Climber: "Indirect!"
...as in, I (the climber) am indirectly tethered to you (the belayer). (I'm attached to the anchors, but also still attached to you...just not directly. Thus, "indirect")

"direct" and "indirect" are relative terms. Relative to what? To the belayer.

If a belayer takes a climber off-belay, there is a different term for that. It's called "off-belay".

Right?
User avatar
tbwilsonky
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:38 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by tbwilsonky »

...

in direct (to the anchors)
haunted.
User avatar
bcombs
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 4:20 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by bcombs »

or, straight in.
pkananen
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:20 am

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by pkananen »

or, directly attached to the anchors
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by pigsteak »

yes, toad, I am betting most say "in dirct" to mean they are straight into the anchors..at that point the belayer takes them off belay and shouts up "off belay"..I typically add in a step before taking someone off, by saying "taking you off belay" before I actually do it....

so for me, I have never said "indirect" to mean my belayer was to be holding me in any form.
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by Toad »

Dammit, Piggy...

Please don't confuse me with toad857. But, I agree with you about it meaning "in direct" and not "indirect".
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
vertical1
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:50 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by vertical1 »

I would like to be able to say that if the climber had repelled off the route, he would not have had this happen, since the accident here in the PMRP people said to lower to be safer. But alas, I cannot say that because careless people will make careless mistakes no matter their preferred method of descent.
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: Climber Falls from Anchor at the Gunks

Post by Toad »

vertical1 wrote: But alas, ...
Alas? Are you walking around talking to a skull of a court jester?
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
Post Reply