Question for the CC

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
neuroshock
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:01 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by neuroshock »

Clevis Hitch wrote:
captain static wrote:
Clevis Hitch wrote:Why are the board members not directly elected by climbers?
This is a straight question that deserves a straight, simple, answer. Here it is - RRGCC Board members are not directly elected by climbers because the original founders of the RRGCC chose to use the "non-membership" model in setting up the organization. This is a common model for small non-profits. The way I like to explain it is that the RRGCC is a company, not a government. When I have time after Rocktoberfest, I can get into the benefits of the "non-membership" model if you like.
It may be common. But its not right. Correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't the CC set in response to the closures going on in the NF and they were formed as a USERS GROUP to parlay with the NF because the NF doesn't speak with individuals, it speaks to USERS GROUPS.
As a USERS GROUP, for non-elected members to make arbitrary decisions in the CONSTITUANCY's name. That smells. Why can't we have an elected voice that aids in the decision making process. Why does it have to be unelected czars who make secret decisions for us as climbers.

The last time I checked it said Red River Gorge CLIMBERS Coalition. Plural. If you want to make it the Kool Kids Klimbing club, I'm sure you can. Even though the initials are already taken. I'm sure the Arian Nation won't mind too much
Clevis, I just want to get a better idea of what you're looking for. If the BoD were elected and decisions were still made against your personal desires/recommendations, would it just be easier to stomach?

As for your claim of "arbitrary decisions in the CONSTITUANCY's name," even if there was an elected individual, or BoD as a whole, the decisions would still be "arbitrary."

In your mind, who would be eligible to be on a ballot? What would qualify the person, aside from a willingness to work and taking heat (appropriate or not)? Who would be eligible to vote? I agree with RRO that an election would likely be a popularity contest, not necessarily a search for the best skill set for the issues at hand.

I'm not, and likely never will be, on the BoD.

-Mike
User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by Toad »

Start your own organization.
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by rhunt »

Clevis Hitch wrote:
captain static wrote:
Clevis Hitch wrote:Why are the board members not directly elected by climbers?
This is a straight question that deserves a straight, simple, answer. Here it is - RRGCC Board members are not directly elected by climbers because the original founders of the RRGCC chose to use the "non-membership" model in setting up the organization. This is a common model for small non-profits. The way I like to explain it is that the RRGCC is a company, not a government. When I have time after Rocktoberfest, I can get into the benefits of the "non-membership" model if you like.

It may be common. But its not right. Correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't the CC set in response to the closures going on in the NF and they were formed as a USERS GROUP to parlay with the NF because the NF doesn't speak with individuals, it speaks to USERS GROUPS.
As a USERS GROUP, for non-elected members to make arbitrary decisions in the CONSTITUANCY's name. That smells. Why can't we have an elected voice that aids in the decision making process. Why does it have to be unelected czars who make secret decisions for us as climbers.

The last time I checked it said Red River Gorge CLIMBERS Coalition. Plural. If you want to make it the Kool Kids Klimbing club, I'm sure you can. Even though the initials are already taken. I'm sure the Arian Nation won't mind too much
captain static gave you the official answer yet you still had to be argumentative which is contradictory to you original post. You got your answer - leave it at that. Anything more and you will be starting the flame war your said you wanted to avoid. If you don't like the official answer take it up in private.

***I am not speaking as a BOD member or RRGCC representative, in fact I am not even a current member - which I needs to change.***
"Climbing is the spice, not the meal." ~ Lurkist
captain static
Posts: 2438
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by captain static »

RRGCC By Laws wrote:SECTION 2.2: Specific Purpose. The Red River Gorge Climbers’ Coalition was formed to ensure open public access to quality, climbing opportunities for the benefit of the recreating climbing public in, and around, the Red River Gorge of Kentucky on public and private land, while encouraging the conservation of the natural environment by protecting, promoting, and ensuring responsible climbing.
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by Clevis Hitch »

Saying that the CC is a company is a mis-statement.

The climbers coalition was formed to parlay as a users group which morphed into a charity/non-profit. Now you're saying its a company and not in the business of governance, but with the LAC going through (if it ever progresses) the Climbers coalition will be in the position of "Governing" the climbing public...

Saying that you don't do it isn't an answer. Its a statement. It doesn't answer the question or even properly acknowledge the question. It just says, (and I'm paraphrasing here); "Because we don't want to."

So once again I'll ask a straightforward question. "Why are the board members not directly elected by climbers?
If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by Clevis Hitch »

captain static wrote:
RRGCC By Laws wrote:SECTION 2.2: Specific Purpose. The Red River Gorge Climbers’ Coalition was formed to ensure open public access to quality, climbing opportunities for the benefit of the recreating climbing public in, and around, the Red River Gorge of Kentucky on public and private land, while encouraging the conservation of the natural environment by protecting, promoting, and ensuring responsible climbing.
All of that is well and good but it doesn't even address the question of "why are there no direct elections?"

Come on man, don't try to baffle me with bullshit or bury the question. Can we work something out here?

As far as the charity of the bod and the direction that they've gone. I don't disagree or want to change. I just wanna know why we can't have direct elections from the constituancy. I mean really, do you think climbers want to destroy the CC? I think the average climber wants to be more involved, its just the CC is stand-offish and secretive. Two things that don't lead to participation....
If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Re: Question for the CC

Post by caribe »

Flow Chart:
Is it broken ─ yes ─► fix it
|
no
|

don't fix it
toad857
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:31 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by toad857 »

dumb thread.
User avatar
bcombs
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 4:20 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by bcombs »

User avatar
Toad
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: Question for the CC

Post by Toad »

Ouroboros
Victory Whip in da House. Yeah.
Post Reply