The Scene at Bob Marley

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
neuroshock
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:01 pm

Post by neuroshock »

Catholes
...Select an inconspicuous site where other people will be unlikely to walk or camp. ... If camping in the area for more than one night, or if camping with a large group, cathole sites should be widely dispersed.

i think this is the crux of the problem. there are just too many climbers in too small of an area!
If the story I was told is accurate, this is a big reason as to why WAG bags were instituted in Indian Creek.

In one of the popular camping areas, people went around and placed a small flag wherever a cathole was found. One complete, the campground/desert was covered with flags. It was decided that the area was too popular for sustained use without some system in place. Now there's a pit toilet and subsidized WAG bags (though it's still just a couple of bucks, I doubt that all actually pay their share).

Granted, decomposition of human waste in a desert environment probably occurs much differently than it would at the Red.
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

sorry, meant 300ft, but 200 is better.
i was taught to go farther than you thought the last person had gone. i guess round here that makes it not too far.
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
captain static
Posts: 2438
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm

Post by captain static »

I learned LNT principles @ NOLS. We were graded on campsites after we had packed up and were ready to leave. There was separate grading for latrine location. At the end of the course the person who was judged to have "the most scenic" latrine location that met LNT principles was awarded a banana split back in Lander.

It is really not that difficult people. Though I try to get my business over with before I head out into the woods I can't think of any situation while in RRG that I couldn't find an acceptable place to go. What really disturbs me about Bob Marley is that the climbers there are not gumbies and should really know better.
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
powen01
Posts: 259
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 5:12 am

Post by powen01 »

It really isn't difficult: http://store.americanalpineclub.org/ind ... -pack.html

And more like that are widely available on the internet...
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by Clevis Hitch »

If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
User avatar
kato
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 12:54 pm

Post by kato »

captain static wrote:What really disturbs me about Bob Marley is that the climbers there are not gumbies and should really know better.
This is a mistake: "hard climber = good person"
No chalkbag since 1995.
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

Hard climber doesn't mean a bad person either, but could be an inexperienced person in the outdoors. We've all been that inexperienced person.
captain static
Posts: 2438
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm

Post by captain static »

You're right Meadows. I tend to assume all climbers are outdoorspeople. One day @ Drive-By I stopped some climbers who were starting to bushwhack over to Bob Marley and pointed them to the new trail that was only roughed in at that point. Later that day I walked the trail over to Bob Marley and asked them what they thought. They were not able to follow it despite the fact there was orange flagging every 30 yards or so :)

Clevis, I will take a look at your list.
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
User avatar
kato
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 12:54 pm

Post by kato »

Meadows, I think I understand where you are coming from, but in this specific case, I have a hard time seeing it as an innocent mistake. If they were carrying TP, then this was their method.
No chalkbag since 1995.
camhead
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:14 pm

Post by camhead »

neuroshock wrote:
Catholes
...Select an inconspicuous site where other people will be unlikely to walk or camp. ... If camping in the area for more than one night, or if camping with a large group, cathole sites should be widely dispersed.

i think this is the crux of the problem. there are just too many climbers in too small of an area!
If the story I was told is accurate, this is a big reason as to why WAG bags were instituted in Indian Creek.

In one of the popular camping areas, people went around and placed a small flag wherever a cathole was found. One complete, the campground/desert was covered with flags. It was decided that the area was too popular for sustained use without some system in place. Now there's a pit toilet and subsidized WAG bags (though it's still just a couple of bucks, I doubt that all actually pay their share).

Granted, decomposition of human waste in a desert environment probably occurs much differently than it would at the Red.
It does. Decomp at the Red and at IC are as different from each other as it gets. If there were small user numbers, it would be completely fine to just shit on a rock in the desert, and then spread it around. The sun dries it in a couple hours, and wind disperses it in a couple days. This was the standard means of waste disposal in the Southwest backcountry for quite a while. At the Red, you would be fine just shitting in a shallow hole, not even burning your toilet paper or anything like that, just because of the moist decomp.

However, neither of these practices work when you have large amounts of people in very close areas
faceholdonacrackclimbDAB!
Post Reply