Yasmeen Wept

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
RRO
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:18 am

Post by RRO »

i dont have enough toes and fingers to use that chart
http://www.redriveroutdoors.com

If you need to contact me , email me. Less Internet, less stress
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

see scin, it is easy to get folks led astray..it is like a dog around cat food, or dudes around one hot girl at miguel's....

the point I was making was this. it clearly takes more dedication and energy as you go up the scale, so therefore more points awrded for harder grades..

my choice 5.10 worth 10 points...13a worth 100 points. so climbing 10 5.10's in a day is equal to sending one 5.13a in a day.....
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
Yasmeen
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:42 am

Post by Yasmeen »

We're too committed to this point system now - don't give in, Ray! It would mess up the order of the universe.
"I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory." --Paul
---
(Emails > PMs)
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Post by caribe »

f(x)=205-14.8x
as defined by Danny
hmmmm
if we apply a linear correction to the send curve that sets the point system to
points=g(x)=-205+14.8x

This is still a linear scale. which is fine

I kind of like
g(x)=x^3/2x-32 starting at x=8 (starting at 5.8 )
where g(x) are sport points.
I think there should be a trad advantage but I am not sure what it should be.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

Yasmeen wrote:We're too committed to this point system now - don't give in, Ray! It would mess up the order of the universe.
Yea, I appreciate Danny's work but man......it's getting really confusing. We may just have to all live with knowing we suck and the points just mean you're old and climb a bunch. But hey, I think getting out and climbing a ton of routes is just as good as working a 5.13 for weeks and sending it. Our point system gives the super obsessed moderate climbers a chance to get the glory of being on top of the RRC Rankings list. What a privilege!

We can just put Pigsteak up in the top 3 so he'll quit bitching.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
512OW
Posts: 3040
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:43 pm

Post by 512OW »

This really, really hurt my brain, and all I did was skim over it. Holy shit...
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
-Tyler Durden

www.odubmusic.com
rustyvasectomy
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:17 pm

Post by rustyvasectomy »

512OW wrote:This really, really hurt my brain, and all I did was skim over it. Holy shit...
thats because you are really, really retarded.
Danny
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 7:20 pm

Post by Danny »

I wasn't suggesting changing anything, I was just trying to think about ways to measure the difficulty function cause I like thinking about stuff like that. If it is close to linear it doesn't matter what the slope is, the relative rankings would still be the same. pigsteaks function has only 2 data points so I'll just assume it's linear too.
512OW
Posts: 3040
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:43 pm

Post by 512OW »

rustyvasectomy wrote:
512OW wrote:This really, really hurt my brain, and all I did was skim over it. Holy shit...
thats because you are really, really retarded.
I do drive the short bus...
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
-Tyler Durden

www.odubmusic.com
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Post by caribe »

Danny wrote:If it is close to linear it doesn't matter what the slope is, the relative rankings would still be the same.
The intercept is important. Your statement is true for all functions with near linear slopes starting at (0,0).
Post Reply