Negative Comments

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
Mike Jones
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:55 pm

Post by Mike Jones »

don't be a crybaby
Who is Mike Jones?
goodguy
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 5:13 am

Post by goodguy »

The answer is for the moderators to edit the stupid sparing in the online guide. Only route information should be in the online guide, not all the other crap.
Oh man, he is messing that up. However, he is missing his left leg so that way would probably be harder for him. SCIN, just before spraying some beta for a climber doing a route the WRONG way.
User avatar
Artsay
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:11 pm

Post by Artsay »

Shoot, do you know how much work that would take? I just say let it ride. It's not like you *have* to read it.
Does he have a strange bear claw like appendage protruding from his neck? He kep petting it.
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Post by caribe »

http://www.redriverclimbing.com/RRCGuid ... hp?id=2197
Anonymous posts just are not worth the damage done to the community. The negativity outweighs any imaginable (perceived but likely fictitious) benefit that could come from anonymity.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

Likely fictitious? Anonymous comments have helped me many times in getting accurate facts for the print guidebook. That is beneficial for me.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

yeah but it is great for shit like this.......http://www.redriverclimbing.com/RRCGuid ... php?id=752
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Post by caribe »

Ray it is your site; that was my opinion.
More opinions:
- These someone comments are not credible.
- . . . . are malicious.
- . . . . do not protect freedom of speech.
If someone is getting something out it, it might be worth the cost, but the logic of the someone option completely mystifies me. :?
SCIN wrote:Likely fictitious? Anonymous comments have helped me many times in getting accurate facts for the print guidebook. That is beneficial for me.
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Post by Saxman »

What about a "rate this comment" button beside comments? Only people logged in could vote + or - and those with more negative votes than positive would go to the bottom but still be viewable. This would also mean comments would need to be sorted by date in descending versus ascending order as they are now. That way the community does the work, not mods, except for the initial coding obviously.
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

I don't understand how making someone register before they post an obnoxious comment is going to do anything. There is no solution for this. It only takes an email account to get a username on here. If someone wants to post an obnoxious comment they'll just grab a username and post it.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
User avatar
der uber
Posts: 1044
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:42 am

Post by der uber »

I was of the opinion that the someone comments were bad. Most of the time they are jackass comments. I'm over it at this point. And sometimes they are funny.

but if you did require they login, at least there would be a name to it other than someone.
Post Reply