The Politics thread

Discussions full of RAGE!
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

Shamis wrote:
Wes wrote:Wow, that is a lot of writing, and so well formatted! It is cool that you took some time to convey your thoughts on the changes and all. Like I said, it isn't set in stone, but I really am trying to make things a bit more positive around here, and while you and perhaps a couple others, will not like the changes, that doesn't mean many others will be happier this way. It really isn't all about you, sorry.
If this is what Ray wants, then just say so. I won't say another word. But I would be shocked if the majority of the active posters here were upset about a bunch of random political threads in the 'you suck' forum.
Wes asked me about it and I said cool I'm game. I don't care either way. I don't read any of the political BS. I like to climb though.

Speaking of climbing. Man, I got shut down by hard moves on two different lines this weekend. I go through these phases where I think I have way more power than I need at the Red then I get on a route that I just get shut down on. I love it because it motivates me to train power again. The Red is not just about endurance all the time. There are some hard ass moves out there.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Post by Shamis »

Glad you got out this weekend. I was stuck at work for 1 day, and my back was in spasm the other day. 'Trolling' these forums seems like the fun thing to do in between builds.

Yeah, plenty of power moves at the red, if you have the endurance to get to them ;)
L Day
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:34 am

Post by L Day »

Ray, It's way past those days for me, but I don't think anybody will ever have more power than they need for the Red. I think you'll always be able to find moves that need 'just a bit more power'. But what sucks about that? :D
User avatar
Josephine
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by Josephine »

live and let live

obviously i have no say in the matter, but the political discussions were not causing harm. if something is not causing harm and others find it enjoyable then just live and let live - rather than try to force everyone to your point of view (that political discussions should be on political forums and not on here).

i also agree that it's a lot nicer to discuss things with the people that you know. that's one of the things that brings us together as a Climbing Community.
"Unthinkably good things can happen, even late in the game." ~ Under the Tuscan Sun
Wes
Posts: 6530
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:46 pm

Post by Wes »

So, I see (and hear it from) both sides - some want no politics, some want more, etc. I feel that, esp. lately, there has been a pretty solid amount of negative political posts, and that trend has been building for a while. There is no way to make everyone happy, and that is OK.

But, we do need to try to find a better balance or something. Perhaps trying to limit new political threads to a few per week, trying to keep the posts more positive (find some good out there!), and a little bit less canned, warmed over, crap from cnn/fox/msnbc/slate/etc and a little bit more original thought would be nice. I am open for suggestions, other then just keeping it the way it has been...

PS
Larry, perhaps you watch to much fox news, but I really don't care all that much about which side is getting the negative coverage, so much as that it is happening. I esp. am not trying to stop these thread to help Obama. Personally, I would like to see him as VP with Al Gore (because he is a mac user).
"There is no secret ingredient"

Po, the kung fu panda
L K Day
Posts: 827
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:29 am

Post by L K Day »

Wes, do know that I see you as my friend, and do not feel that our friendship is in any way harmed by this disagreement. This is a privately owned website, and it is kind of self evident that those who run it are free to run it as they see fit.

That said, I don't think you'll look back on your decision to censor political discussion here as one of your prouder moments.
Fartspray
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:41 pm

Post by Fartspray »

Last edited by Fartspray on Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wes
Posts: 6530
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:46 pm

Post by Wes »

heh, Larry, believe me when I say that I have way too many other much worse "not proud" moments that something like this would be way, way down the list. Beside, I don't feel bad about this at all - just trying to make some positive changes to balance the needs of all the users out.
"There is no secret ingredient"

Po, the kung fu panda
Fartspray
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:41 pm

Post by Fartspray »

Last edited by Fartspray on Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Danny
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 7:20 pm

Post by Danny »

Wes wrote:I am open for suggestions, other then just keeping it the way it has been...
It might be too much trouble but one option that would allow people to still start as many political threads as they want and some others to not see them is to make a new politics forum under the pit category and allow registered users to unsubscribe from individual forums they are not interested in. I don't know if the code for this is built in but at least it's an idea. I guess it would also need to only show posts from forums one is subscribed to when searching etc. In principle it could also reduce load on the search engine.
Post Reply