anticlmber wrote:if you throw yourself at one thing obsessivley enough, you'll do it. - anon
Redpoint VS Onsight
-
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am
anddbrayack wrote:I've always considered routes at the red to be easier to Red Point
????dbrayack wrote:Routes at the red are MUCh easier to onsite.
From your posts I guess you where saying "compared to the New" This probably doesn't pertain to RP VS Onsight. This might be a "you are good at endurance thing or you might be better at steeper rock than face climbing thing."
You must be speaking to the 3 persons out of 34 who had a greater than 1 whole number grade difference.anticlmber wrote:word wes, word. thats exactly what i think for epic projectors. i did this super hard route but i can't onsite this route thhe boyscouts climb.
Will you three please step forward?
First of all I would like to say Anticlimber hates you. Don't worry about it he hates everyone, including himself.
Second I would like to know the RP and Onsight Routes. Nothing to be ashamed of here, just want to know for the record.
[quote="JR"]I have heard that a well rounded climber will have a full grade between your best onsight versus highest redpoint. [quote]
i think i'm missing something. i always felt that a "well rounded climber" would climb sport, trad, and boulder equally well.
i'm not sure how you can define the "well rounded climber" by whether or not there is a full letter grade between her onsights/redpoints. this idea seems to suppose that all grades are equal - nothing is soft and nothing is sandbagged.
it seems to me that if someone is "well rounded" their onsights/redpoints would be closer together. that would indicate that their skillz at reading the rock are as good as their ability to work the route.
not that i'm a well-rounded climber by any defination
i think i'm missing something. i always felt that a "well rounded climber" would climb sport, trad, and boulder equally well.
i'm not sure how you can define the "well rounded climber" by whether or not there is a full letter grade between her onsights/redpoints. this idea seems to suppose that all grades are equal - nothing is soft and nothing is sandbagged.
it seems to me that if someone is "well rounded" their onsights/redpoints would be closer together. that would indicate that their skillz at reading the rock are as good as their ability to work the route.
not that i'm a well-rounded climber by any defination
"Unthinkably good things can happen, even late in the game." ~ Under the Tuscan Sun
Me too.Josephine wrote: i always felt that a "well rounded climber" would climb sport, trad, and boulder equally well.
I don't.Josephine wrote: i'm not sure how you can define the "well rounded climber" by whether or not there is a full letter grade between her onsights/redpoints.
The poll shows that most climbers at the Red are indeed closer. Me included.Josephine wrote: it seems to me that if someone is "well rounded" their onsights/redpoints would be closer together.