Anchor Point Question

Placing a cam? Slotting a nut? Slinging a tree?
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Post by Shamis »

Shamis wrote:
Gaar wrote: Saxman
From your website
"A dynamic climbing rope must be designed to absorb enough energy so that the maximum force on an 80 kg. (180 lb.) climber in a factor 2 fall is not more than 12 kn. (2698 lb.). The maximum force on a top anchor could approach 19.9 kN or 4475 lbs."


God damn all I said was build the anchor to withstand 4496lbs and you'll be fine. Shit if you dont want to be safe fine with me, do whatever the fuck you want!
I couldn't find that part.
Ok, I found that part. I still think its wrong, and they don't explain how it could be true.
B.J.
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:34 pm

Post by B.J. »

Shamis wrote: "A dynamic climbing rope must be designed to absorb enough energy so that the maximum force on an 80 kg. (180 lb.) climber in a factor 2 fall is not more than 12 kn. (2698 lb.).
I found that a couple of times, but...
The maximum force on a top anchor could approach 19.9 kN or 4475 lbs."
Where is that part?
Shamis
Posts: 1343
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:11 pm

Post by Shamis »

B.J. wrote:Where is that part?
Under the pulley section, not sure how I got there, gaar pm'ed me the link.
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Post by Saxman »

Gaar is in denial.
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
Gaar
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:51 pm

Post by Gaar »

"climb, fall, send, go home"
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Post by ynot »

just build it so it holds a truck. all that math just makes your head hurt
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
Gaar
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 5:51 pm

Post by Gaar »

hmm yes. I concour :mrgreen:
"climb, fall, send, go home"
Post Reply