American Dream

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
Buster
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 3:55 pm

Post by Buster »

goodguy wrote:Just 2 cents.... Rock climbing should not be contrived. When equipping a route if a bolt is placed to low or high, causing the route to be harder (spicy), the route is completely changed and totally contrived. Runouts in sport climbing for any other reason than there is no clipping hold or stance, are crap. If someone wants a spicy route and wants to make people pucker, start setting at a gym and put bad clipping holds at every bolt, don't risk someone else getting hurt for no reason.

This was not in any way directed at anyone, just mpo.
If a bolt is placed anywhere (high, low, whatever) the route is changed. Climbing is contrived.
'Darling, may I please be excused for a moment?
I have to shake hands with a very dear friend of mine, whom I hope to introduce you to after dinner.'
The polite way to excuse yourself and take a piss.
goodguy
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 5:13 am

Post by goodguy »

Buster.

I agree, climbing a bolted route is contrived to an extent. But wouldn't you agree that it is possible to make a route harder, both physically and mentally with poor bolt placement.
Oh man, he is messing that up. However, he is missing his left leg so that way would probably be harder for him. SCIN, just before spraying some beta for a climber doing a route the WRONG way.
512OW
Posts: 3040
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 9:43 pm

Post by 512OW »

Toy wrote:
Frankly, I don't mind hard clips, but isn't sport climbing supposed to be about the moves? Thats what all the hardcore boltclippers are always preaching...

I think if you want to force "pucker-factor", maybe you should just go trad climbing...

All these sport climbing rules are retarded.
It must be very inconvenient to stand up every time you need to speak. Quit talkin out yer bunghole and think before responding dude. The route is fine as is. Period. The clip isn't even that hard if your not in over you head. If it is too hard to clip, there's prolly another route out there to suit you. Nothing "forced". In fact, what I suggested is just the opposite.
Take things a little personal, do we? Maybe you shouldn't read into the posts you're responding too so deeply. I was speaking in general, not about any particular route. So... take your own advice and think before responding. In fact, maybe even rethink it. You wouldn't sound so much like an elitist prick if you did.
"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."
-Tyler Durden

www.odubmusic.com
Toy
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:16 pm

Post by Toy »

Clever OW. Now can you keep focused long enough to comment on the issue in the thread instead of pointless labeling.

Goodguy the bolt isn't too low or high. It's at the appropriate height. Lowering the second or adding another between the two would create z-clip potential. Raising it create gound/ledge fall potential. Chris put it in the right spot. It just so happens to be in a place that requires a tough clip. Adding another bolt would make it contrived (or more so) to use your verbage.
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

why not remove the first bolt, and just clip the second. problem solved.
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
Toy
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:16 pm

Post by Toy »

That'd be up to Chris (and no one else imo), but I bet I can guess his response. He climbs it from the ground. It climbs fine that way. He doesn't typically bolt routes with a required 1st bolt stick clip which is what would happen if the first is taken out. If you feel unsafe, stick clip the second. If you want to climb it from the ground, more power to ya. But don't remove the first bolt and reduce to route to satisfy the least common denominator
the lurkist
Posts: 2240
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 2:07 pm

Post by the lurkist »

Something that needs to be said about this route that has already been mentioned, this route is a steep, juggy 12b/c. It is a good break-in route to the grade of 12c (I am not sure what grade the route is published at). The point is that I am betting folks do get on this route who are not solid at the grade. The route does have a challenging clip at the second bolt. It is the folks who are stretching themselves looking for the possible 12c send who are complaining. Anyone who uses it for a warmup isn't complaining.
It isn't necessarily good or bad, just a characteristic of the route.
I think the folks who are stepping up to the plate need to accept the stick clip option or clip the second bolt the old fashion way.
I have to agree with others here. The route is bolted correctly and CM goes to excessive degrees to bolt routes with the optimum clip. It is what he calls craftsmanship.
"It really is all good ! My thinking only occasionally calls it differently..."
Normie
allah
Posts: 1443
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:10 am

Post by allah »

The thing i first asked was should there be another bolt below the first, then i think in a later post, a possible moveing of bolts (which i dont think will ever happen or need to happen) But i do see where people get scared to stand there and stick clip the first 2 bolts with out being clipped into a bolt.

Oh and about re-bolting MILF money, the bolts definatly need moved just the first 3 or so to make it a safer route
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

did doyle get permission from the equippers on MILF money and 50 words. or is this something the FA gets to decide?
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

[quote="the It is what he calls craftsmanship.[/quote]

craftsman ship is the last two bolts on supafly sticking out due to rock, (they were put in that way) and the anchor on the ??? right sticking out and in cracked rock as well. quality craftsmanship i'm sure.
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
Post Reply