Sandy Berger stole highly classified documents on terrorism from the national archives. Secreted then out of the building by stuffing them in his pants and socks, hid them on a construction site next door, then returned after dark to pick them up. He then took the documents to his home where he destroyed them.
Now he's been rewarded with a position as an advisor to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Wonder who he was protecting by destroying the documents?
You know, if you or I had done something like this our asses would be rotting in jail.
Here's a conspiracy for ya!
I still don't understand how Hillary can run for president. I thought you could only serve two terms?
Sarcasm is a tool the weak use to avoid confrontation. People with any balls just outright lie.
[quote="Meadows"]I try not to put it in my mouth now, but when I do, I hold it with just my lips.[/quote]
[quote="Meadows"]I try not to put it in my mouth now, but when I do, I hold it with just my lips.[/quote]
I just don't believe it 
Copies? originals? none the less, he removed sensitive information, from a government agency, without permission, and destroyed them! Not only that, he was about as smooth as rough grit sandpaper when he did it, what an idiot. All that trouble to steal copies??? He either pulled off the crime of the century right under our noses or he's the second biggest dumbass in Hillarys clan. you want a conspiracy, start with this guy and those documents. Either way, no worse than GW'S antics of late! 
I so wish we had a third party, The "Common Party",
you know, like common sense, common men, common women, doing what we need for a change and not them.....
I so wish we had a third party, The "Common Party",you know, like common sense, common men, common women, doing what we need for a change and not them.....
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
Why steal and destroy copies? Because of the handwritten notes in the margins of certain copies. The left couldn't blame 9/ll on Bush until they destroyed evidence of the Clinton's negligence in the matter. Neither party did anything like an admirable job in dealing with the known threat of Bin Laden and his scum.
I am sure that document stealing and destroying occures all the time in washington, that would explain why berger's attitude was so cavaleir about the whole situation. Conspiracy? Sure, he was covering some ass (pun intended). It happens all the time.
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
What?!? Are you now going to say that Bush was putting a lot of attention, funding, and support behind anti-terrorism before 9/11? Are you really going to say that? Despite all the evidence?L K Day wrote:...The left couldn't blame 9/ll on Bush until they destroyed evidence of the Clinton's negligence in the matter. ...
Bush gutted the budget of the anti-terrorism task force Clinton set up.
Bush ignored his advisors on terroristic threats.
Bush ignored his security briefings. Supposedly he was all but asleep.
Are you really going to try to portray the spoiled fucker that took office in 2000 as some kind of victim of a conspiracy?
[size=75]You are as bad as Alan, and even he hits the mark sometimes. -charlie
"Not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill[/size]
"Not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill[/size]