Elite level routes

Post by **tomdarch** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:38 am

anticlmber wrote:like, is edible underwear considered a fruit, vegetable, or dairy. or is it like a salad before the fish dish??

Would it depend on the flavor of the edible underwear? Like "apple" would be fruit, "gorgonzola" would be dairy, "asparagus" would be vegetable, and "salmon" would be meat.

Is all edible underwear the same basic stuff? I've never 'experienced' the product, but I always sort of assumed that it was a variation on 'fruit leather', which would make it pretty unappealing. ("Hold on baby. Just a sec. I, uh, got some underwear stuck to my teef...") Actually, the whole concept is kind of unappealing. Seems like one of those 'titillating concepts' that doesn't play out in real life...

What's wrong with good old whipped cream? (well, not old whipped cream, I mean fresh whipped cream.)

Post by **Crankmas** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:25 am

does anyone with a dog sometimes get that feeling that when the dog is looking at you and their mouth starts moving that they're right on the verge of truly speaking to you?

Post by **Spragwa** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:37 am

Dakota says it's a fruit.

Post by **Meadows** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:12 am

pigsteak wrote: sweet meadows...the bell bottoms I still own from 1976 are back!

Not to make you feel old, but I was born that year.

Post by **TankAzz** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:51 pm

Meadows wrote:
pigsteak wrote: sweet meadows...the bell bottoms I still own from 1976 are back!
Not to make you feel old, but I was born that year.

or not to make you feel really old, but i was not born for five more years

Post by **TankAzz** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:53 pm

oh, and when i brought up that quote that started all this, for the record i obviously was not there either. i just wanted to highlight the fact that many people are putting in a ton of work, and if people don't appreciate it i'll kick their asses

okay, probably won't kick their asses since i am so passive aggressive. either way, it sounds like people ARE grateful and psyched, and that is what i care about.

Post by **mcrib** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:46 pm

why is it super lame to feel strongly about a period of time in which the Red wasn't a tourist trao for gym climbers from all over? I love thinking back when the people at the crag were my friends and if we had something to say to each other we did it in person not on a message board. I love it when people throw out their Sharma story "oh dude I was here when Sharma bent this place over" wow I am sure impressed that you were a spectator on that day of climbing.

Post by **pigsteak** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:51 pm

so you are saying it is now a tourist trap for gym climbers, but back "in the day" it was a tourist trap for weak climbers to star gaze?

just remember, the good old days are only good in our memories. today's legions of climbers are not better or worse, just different. the crusties of the 60's probably thought the long hairs of the 70's were chumps too....and then lycra spoiled for everyone in the 80's....

Post by **Horatio Felacio** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:08 pm

i think basically what everyone is trying to say is that muir valley should be the place where every climber not approved by me has to go and climb.

Post by **anticlmber** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:57 am

i think all of you should just stop climbing. it would at least get rid of all the uptight, whiney ass, old(no school, just old) holier than thou, crotch pheasants. and your stupid fucking dogs.