we need a new term

Post by **pigsteak** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:57 am

this is truly sad...for the 5% of you who don't already disregard my posts, now is your time to bail....

rhunt...I can hook you up...

Post by **heidiramma** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:14 am

pigsteak wrote:so I was reading the TNB newsletter from Climbing mag, and decided that we finally need to differentiate on the gender of the FA.

from now on, please use FMA and FFA when spraying.

thank you.

0h, so FA doesn't refer to 'fat ass'? That changes everything. Now I get it.

Post by **pigsteak** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:47 pm

heidi..it does, the additional letter is just to designate "to whom" the fat ass belongs.

Post by **Crankmas** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:22 pm

sounds as if you guys are gonna have to meditate on this one, let me know if there is a blockage and I will produce the answer in the snow later in the season

Post by **heidiramma** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:11 am

pigsteak wrote:heidi..it does, the additional letter is just to designate "to whom" the fat ass belongs.

Right on. I like the way you think. We're going to get along juuust fine. . .

Post by **flashmaster** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:06 pm

Ohhhhhhh. I thought this was a fourm for Future Farmers of America. No wonder why I was so confused.

RRC Archives

we need a new term

Re: we need a new term