Dogs at Muir

Innocent subjects that took a turn for the worst.
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

the FS won't ban dogs. just you wait and see. you can't have them on state park land, (trails and such) leash or no leash. dog's are one of the biggest problems land managers face in regards to problems that can't be kept track of.

and the dog wasn't aggressive, he's just playing.
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

really the only thing good about dogs is that they help keep the price of chinese food down. mmm mmmmmmmm. good eatin
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
Wes
Posts: 6530
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:46 pm

Post by Wes »

Maybe we should ban dope smoking at the crag as well? Talk about cutting back the crowds!
"There is no secret ingredient"

Po, the kung fu panda
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Post by rhunt »

I agree with Pru and anticlimber, All the cliffs that are open to the public allow dogs today, MV will not allow dogs as of Jan 1st 08'

And dogs are becoming a large threat to climbing access. Yet its really an easy problem land owners/managers will just not allow them on their lands. I am sure if the RRG forest service were to say that dogs are causing problems with cliff bases, for example, they would say no dogs at climbing areas. Yet as Pru pointed out a ban on dogs at climbing areas would not really be fair, they would have to ban dogs at all areas.
"Climbing is the spice, not the meal." ~ Lurkist
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

now that's a great idea. all those dogs that are stoned wandering around. good idea was. keep'em coming. oh have you seen my water pipe around??
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
User avatar
krampus
Posts: 3933
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:31 am

Post by krampus »

yeah, dope smoking just introduces a whole new level of environmental impact. Thank god I had a proper moral upbringing and would never attempt such a contemptuous action. :|
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Post by rhunt »

yeah and they should ban cig smoking and swearing and trad climbing and carry a crash pad to a rope climbing area and using a biner to clip your chalk bag to your harness and wearing socks with climbnig shoes and two-way radios at sport climbing areas and groups over 4 in line for one climb and book bags as climbing packs....etc.

:D
"Climbing is the spice, not the meal." ~ Lurkist
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Post by Andrew »

Whats wrong with a book bag as a climbing pack? I have been rocking the Abercrobie and Fitch for years now.
Living the dream
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Post by rhunt »

Andrew wrote:Whats wrong with a book bag as a climbing pack? I have been rocking the Abercrobie and Fitch for years now.
Gumby...
"Climbing is the spice, not the meal." ~ Lurkist
Spragwa
Posts: 3650
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 4:05 pm

Post by Spragwa »

Good Lord anticlimber, you are the absolute worst at the "not my dog, he'd never have done anything." Seriously bad form.

Dogs aren't the worst threat to closure, humans are.

Still, everyone obey the freaking rules and tell people whne you see them breaking them.
Jesus only knows that she tries too hard. She's only trying to keep the sky from falling.

-Everlast
Post Reply