Pru wrote: chriss wrote:Resorting to name calling ( hmmm what type of assumptions should I make about you.) But I guess that what people do when they don't have a valid point to make, or their rash assumptions where imcorrect.
You started with your sideways comment about me being ignorant. My point, the one you completely ignored, is valid. Jackass.
Actually I asked if you were ignorant. But you probally can't understand the difference.
Pru wrote:
chriss wrote:If you feel so strongly you shouldn't be using chalk, sticky rubber (leaves black on the rock), sport climbing or anchors of any kind. Are you sure you don't like climbing in the gym more than outside????
Again, you completely ignored the point. Who is the ignorant one in this conversation? Jackass
Actually I validated the fact that your point is no more valid than not using chalk, sticky rubber ,....
Pru wrote:
chriss wrote:Anyhow, the reason I usually don't remove tick marks, if I don't send I want it there for when I come back, the route has fixed draws and the steepness makes it a hassle to get back in, I forget. But feel free to remove them, I know I do when I get on routes (maybe I should whine about it on the internet).
Another selfish climber.
Another ignorant statemenet. All climbers are selfish. We use chalk don't we, ohh, you must be the one I saw carrying the power washer to the cliff to clean up after theself.
Pru wrote:
chriss wrote:Really though, if this is an impact you can't handle, don't use chalk. It's that simple.
It's not JR's use of chalk that is the problem. Jackass.
Actually it is, your use of chalk as well. If the impact is to much in your eyes, anti up, hopefully no one sees you climbing at the red using chalk.
This is kind of fun, do you have anything you would personally like to add, or is name calling all you got.