gulliver wrote:gunslnga wrote:I have a valid question, based on if Swillary Clinton gets in office.
All you libs who are screaming about using dialogue to settle Middle East catastrophies, what happens when Swillary is president. The last I knew
Muslims did'nt reguard women as human beings (dead on in her case) so
who will discuss the peace, you all will bring, with men, who would'nt piss on
you, if you burst into flames, right in front of them. I can just see her trying to impose the Clintonian will on Abdul and Mohamed, should be good for a few laughs
anyway. Back to the regularly scheduled mess......
Swillary?
Care to explain how she isn't human?
Muslims did'nt reguard women as human beings (dead on in her case) so who will discuss the peace,
I've got a problem with how women are subjected in many Muslim countries, but this is wrong. The only answer for you is to research it a bit.
There are still vestiges of cultural and religious bias against women in this country. Sects of religion who have a problem with women ministers right down to cutting their hair or wearing make-up. Everytime I hear crap like you just posted I have to wonder how much misogyny plays into the anti-Hillary talk. It's ok to have differing political views, but how about addressing those. The Hillary bashing started 15 years ago with talk radio morons as a means of attacking her husband. That's a weird tack but apparently it's a popular one considering the Wilson/Plame thing. Does the Right still have a problem with women?
If it's such a ridiculous concept, why in the world would a woman be appointed Sec. of State?
#1. My question was not sexually, politically, or religiously based.
#2. believe what you want, or what you think you can deny or prove, but she is as big a crook as her husband, several people, some now missing, implicated her directly in Whitewater, amongst other less notable crimes. O'h and as far as the Human comment goes, all bias aside, have you seen her, she is an automaton, (robot).
#3. I asked a simple question, based on current affairs, with the middle east and how quickly things seem to be esculating in that region.
#4. I would vote for any candidate who said/did anything different than the same old, same old, she has not impressed me one bit, she will say/do anything to get elected, but what will she do differently??? Give me some examples how she is any different than her husband, other than his balls are bigger. And yes I know the Reps/Cons do the same, but as stated several times in several post's, currently I am voting for Obama.
#5. So now that I have removed Sexism, Religion, and right/left politics, who besides Yasmeen, can answer my original question.
#6. I love Condi Rice, I would vote for her.
Yasmeen, I agree mostly with you, but having dealt with angry Muslims, who only got angrier when the female soldiers (usually higher rank than me) tried to exert they're authority onto the already heated situation (traffic accident involving camels) imagine this when these Muslims are the Leaders of Islamic states??
on a final note, I don't have an answer or even an idea, hence my original post.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
