I'm a 5.x Climber!

Placing a cam? Slotting a nut? Slinging a tree?
Guest

Post by Guest »

SCIN wrote:
Lynne wrote:well since I suck equally at trad and sport, it works for me. However there are many incredibly accomplished climbers who have never jammed a crack (and never will). So if someone onsights 5.13x sport, are they only a ~5.4 climber?

I don't think so.
In my eyes, yes.
LOL well hell, that makes me feel pretty damn good about myself then!
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

Because I focus my efforts on being a well rounded climber, of course I'm going to judge others that way. Why would I look at others any different than what I feel is important?

I feel that one of the best climbers in the world is Ron Kauk. Has he done 5.15? Nope. But he is a very accomplished and well rounded rock climber. Many kids have no idea who he is.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
SikMonkey
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 3:35 am

Post by SikMonkey »

I wonder if that's who La Sportiva named the "Kaukulator" shoe after? Coincidence? .....yeah, probably. :D

Mj
...quitting drinking is kinda like washing your hands after you take a crap...why start now?
Guest

Post by Guest »

SCIN wrote:Because I focus my efforts on being a well rounded climber, of course I'm going to judge others that way. Why would I look at others any different than what I feel is important?
You shouldn't. And your questions are good, because clearly many people rate themselves under a different set of criteria. That is why I think that when you are hooking up with someone for the first time, you have to specify what you mean. Especially you bad asses!

I think being a well rounded climber is important, too, but I do know people who choose to "only" boulder or sport climb and I respect their pursuits. Just not as much as I do someone who is accomplished in all types of climbing.
Wes
Posts: 6530
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:46 pm

Post by Wes »

Oh, and I don't think should go by onsite ability, more like what you generally send with a couple tries, esp. for bouldering and sport climbing.

Wes
"There is no secret ingredient"

Po, the kung fu panda
CBP
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:35 am

Post by CBP »

onsite- the only gauge.
Gretchen
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:16 pm

Post by Gretchen »

NOt everyone has the time to focus on all three areas, sport, trad, bouldering. I certainly would not change my opinion of someone that I would rate a solid climber any differently if they just concentration on sport, for example. Sure I would love to be a well rounded climber technically but I tend to lean moretowards bouldering but still work at sport/trad. Plus I am not out there tearing up the rock looking for sponsorship, name recognition, blah blah blah. I am out there enjoying the sports, my friends, and my husband. It's a package deal.

So my point being that it all comes down to each individual's agenda will determine how well rounded of a climber they can become! Hell I'm round enough as it is :P
Just genuinely disengenuous.
CBP
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:35 am

Post by CBP »

and that which you can on-site pretty much all day......under...............stress.
CBP
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:35 am

Post by CBP »

how dare you post when i am posting. i should just gauge your climbiing ability right here and now.
Power2U
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 1:18 pm

Post by Power2U »

See "You Suck, I Suck Everything Sucks" for a humourous quote about how stupid this thread is....

Climbing is about individualism and how we push ourselves to be better than we are, not better than others around us, PERIOD!
Lest we all forget... climbing is a mostly meaningless pursuit that we do for fun.
Post Reply