Aconcagua: December, 2007

Other Crags, Aid Climbing, Bouldering, etc...
GWG
Posts: 840
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 1:45 pm

Aconcagua: December, 2007

Post by GWG »

I'll be heading to Aconcagua in December, 2007 if anyone is interested in joining me. Start saving your pennies now and the cost won't be so bad when payment is due.

I'm also considering Denali in June but my work schedule may be conflicting so that is still up in the air.

PM me if interested.

GWG
haas
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:06 pm

Post by haas »

both peaks are overcroweded but trash is less visable on Denali. Denali is more aesthetic and more of a real "mountain" route, but the West Butt is WAY over croweded. If you don't mind crowds, it's a good way to go, but there are other routes just as technically easy that lead to the 14,000 advanced basecamp. I personally think Denali is way better bang for your buck. It also will give you a more "climber" feel, with both the Kahiltna camp and at ABC.

Depending on your experience level, I am heading to Peru for the month of July with another guy if you are in for some alpine. Elevation is equivelant to or greater than Denali.

Good luck!
haas
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:06 pm

Post by haas »

Also, if you decide on Denali, I highly recommend flying with Doug Geeting. He's been doing it the longest and he's still one of the nicest guys out there. He let my partner and I crash in his office for about 4 days after our trip was over while we were bumming around Talkeetna.
Zspider
Posts: 1013
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 3:02 pm

Post by Zspider »

haas wrote:

I personally think Denali is way better bang for your buck.

*************
Yeah, but in town I doubt the Alaskan women measure up to the Mexican ones.

ZSpiddy
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

GWG, I think I know someone who is wanting to make another trip down there. PM me your info.
Zspider
Posts: 1013
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 3:02 pm

Post by Zspider »

Whoops! Aconcagua is in...Peru, right? Not Mexico.

ZSpiddy
haas
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:06 pm

Post by haas »

Aconcagua sits on the border of Argentina and Chile
Day
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:21 pm

Post by Day »

Aconcagua and Denali are very different, but both are really cool. Aconcagua is really third world. Not technically difficult at all, but remote, with a fairly long approach if you do the Polish Glacier.

While much easier than Denali, Aconcagua has one great hazard (OK, two if you count drowning on the approach). That is it's way too easy to get high on the mountain much quicker than you can acclimatize. When I climbed it back in the 80s there were two bodies in our high camp. On our way down I found a note tucked into some gear that we had left at 14,000 feet. It was a cheery message from some climbers from Denver who had turned back at 16,000 after one of their party developed HAPE. Years later I came to know one of the members of this party and found out that the guy who got sick had died! So be careful, even on this relatively easy peak. OK, there are three great hazards, if you count El Viente Blanco, and you'd better.
tomdarch
Posts: 2407
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:22 pm

Post by tomdarch »

Doesn't mountain climbing usually involve walking up hill .... a lot?

Not my idea of fun, but hey, whatever you're into... (wierdos)
Bacon is meat candy.
L K Day
Posts: 827
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:29 am

Post by L K Day »

tomdarch,

Yep, you got it figured out. But don't spread it around, or there'll be nobody climbing mountains.
Post Reply