If people want to bring up ethics, then they have to expect to discuss ethics.charlie wrote:People heard this tree fall and that's why we have this thread. Feign ethics while posturing complicity if you want, but your ignorance shows.DuppyC wrote:......If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear it, does it make any sound at all?
Personally, I choose to honor 'closed' routes. (It's easy for me becuase most red-tagged routes are harder than I can send.) But I have a hard time explaining why I would honor those requests. About the best I can do is a sort of "Golden Rule" argument. (Treat others as you would want them to treat you.) I operate by it in this situation, but why should I expect other people to accept it?
The 'tree in the forest' metaphor is right on in this situation. If someone sneaks in and sends a red-tagged route, leaves no trace of having been there and never tells anyone else about the send, how is the 'red tagger' harmed? If you want to make some sort of metaphysical argument ("but God knows!") then go right ahead. Otherwise - how is the 'red-tagger' harmed if she never knows that she didn't get the FA?