Climbing Museum?

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
ruetut
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:07 pm

Climbing Museum?

Post by ruetut »

Will the latest article on the RRG in Urban Climber make it into the online Climbing Museum anytime soon?

Just curious

thanks,
BT
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

Are you volunteering to scan it? I was going to do it, but I haven't made it to a scanner yet.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

I've got some cool stuff but my scanner sucks.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
ruetut
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:07 pm

Post by ruetut »

What file does it need to be scanned into? I'm limited to the iupui computer labs
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

It looks like the others are in .jpg.
User avatar
SCIN
Posts: 4932
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:19 pm

Post by SCIN »

Anything really. I can convert it if you can scan it.
Yo Ray jack dynomite! Listen to my beat box! Bew ch ch pff BEW ch ch pfff! Sweet!

-Horatio
User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:48 pm

Post by ray »

Just added Stones of Years - Second Edition:
http://www.redriverclimbing.com/museum/ ... mage0.html
tomdarch
Posts: 2407
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:22 pm

Post by tomdarch »

Stones of Years, 2nd Ed. 1990 wrote:The ethics of "rap bolting" have been argued thoroughly and virulently in nearly every climbing magazine published within the last five years. I do not intend to reiterate the debate here. Consult any of these publications for the details, substitute the "Red River Gorge" for "Yosemite," "Hueco Tanks," etc., and you'll have a good approximation of the situation. The upshot locally is that "rap bolted" routes are non de rigeur. The reason is that climbers of all levels are overwhelmingly opposed to them. The reasoning is that in and area with inexhaustible potential for natural lines well within the current ability of many climbers, it is both arrogant and stupid to begin exhausting a future resource at this time. Any "rap bolt" routes that do appear are considered fair game for removal. To be fair, a small amount of articulate dissent has been voiced by the individuals who are interested in the vast face-climbing potential of the area. But routes such as Whimpering Insanity, Zimbabwae, Shiver Me Timbers, Into the Void Direct, 5.11 Jimmy, and Pulling Pockets are all adventurous, bolted face climbs done in a style that is beyond rebuke.
Good thing we've spent the last 15 years working our way through the inexhaustible supply of moderate "natural" lines. And as for those goofball "individuals" who are interested in the "face-climbing potential", well, the community has tolerated routes like Whimpering Insanity and Void Direct - isn't that enough? Besides, now is clearly not the time to 'exhaust' the potential of maybe a hundred or so face climbs scattered around the Red!

(I'm just poking fun at the very different perspective that existed less than 20 years ago...)
Bacon is meat candy.
JB
Posts: 1228
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 8:36 pm

Post by JB »

notice that you can't rebuke the bolts that hackworth put in, but he can rebuke yours! ;-)
[size=75]i may be weak, but i have bad technique[/size]
gulliver
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:39 am

Post by gulliver »

quote from the "Stones of Years" article posted above:

"The reasoning is that in and area with inexhaustible potential for natural lines well within the current ability of many climbers, it is both arrogant and stupid to begin exhausting a future resource at this time."

I think this still has something to say to drilling and chipping enthusiasts.
Post Reply